Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Legislature and governor attack quality of judiciary
GUEST VIEW

Legislature and governor attack quality of judiciary

  • 1
{{featured_button_text}}
Lon Dale

LON DALE

To play on Robin Williams’ famous line, “Good Morning Montana,” your ability to rely on the judicial system to protect your constitutional rights and provide fairness and objectivity was just seriously eroded by the Legislature’s passage of SB 140 and the March 16 signature of Gov. Gianforte.

So who orchestrated this subversion of the Montana justice system? Ninety-eight republican representatives and senators the voters sent to Helena voted for SB 140 abolishing the Judicial Nomination Commission (JNC). This ill-conceived legislation was universally opposed by all 51 democratic representatives and senators.

The JNC has ably and faithfully served Montana citizens for almost 50 years through both Republican and Democratic administrations. Why was this aberrant legislation advanced through the Legislature in the face of adamant opposition from the Montana Judges Association, the Montana State Bar, the Montana Trial Lawyers Association, the Montana Defense Trial Lawyers Association, the ACLU, and district Judge John Brown, the chairman of the JNC? Answer: Marching orders from Gov. Gianforte and his misguided, but loyal Lt. Gov. Kristen Juras.

The JNC was established as a direct result of and by specific guidance from the 1971 constitutional convention and the resulting 1972 Montana Constitution that did away with the absolute power of the governor under the 1889 constitution to appoint anyone with a law degree to judicial vacancies. The JNC operated pursuant to 1973 legislation and was composed of four lay persons from throughout the state appointed by the governor, two attorneys appointed by the Montana Supreme Court and a district judge elected by the Montana district judges. Section 3-1-1001 MCA et seq. This seven member commission has for almost 50 years screened and vetted judicial applicants in a completely open and public process to assure competency, integrity and experience of judicial nominees, and only advancing the names of three to five of the most qualified candidates to fill each judicial vacancy with the governor making the final selection from the nominees advanced.

Under SB 140 appointment of judges wrongfully reverts to the same process in the former 1889 constitution and incorrectly reestablishes the absolute power of the governor to appoint anyone, i.e., siblings, friends, the openly bias or prejudiced, inexperienced, or anti-LGBT, whose sole qualification most likely will be their political connections, all contrary to the mandate of 1972 constitution. Appears Gianforte needed to abolish the commission because the persons desired to be his judges lack the temperament, integrity or experience necessary to receive passage through the commission’s gate. So in order for Gianforte to hand pick his very own political favorites, out goes the baby with the bath water.

In the meantime, three hardworking district court judges, nominated through the JNC and appointed by Gov. Bullock during his tenure await Senate confirmation. These three district court judges are currently in court performing their judicial functions on behalf of the citizens of Montana, while the Senate and the governor power play with their future. In all the years of the JNC’s existence, there has never been a jurist appointed through the JNC process not confirmed by the Senate. For good reason, all were superbly qualified, as are the three judges awaiting Senate confirmation.

A petition challenging the constitutionality of SB 140 was filed with the Montana Supreme court the day after the governor signed SB 140 into law. The petition seeks to revoke the governor’s and Legislature’s abuse of power as contrary to the 1972 Montana Constitution. If SB 140 is found to be unconstitutional, as it very well ought to be, and the JNC is resurrected, Montanans will need to pay heed to this collaborated assault on their constitutional protections and the quality of the Montana judiciary when the next election cycle rolls around.

Lon Dale of Missoula has engaged in an active civil litigation practice representing plaintiffs, defendants, individuals, businesses, and insurance companies for over 45 years. He has been lead counsel in more than 40 jury cases tried to verdict, and in more than 50 cases decided by Montana’s Supreme Court. 

8
1
1
0
2

Tags

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

October is here, leaves are falling, and perhaps Montanans should not be surprised that the Montana Democrats on the Districting and Apportion…

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News