{{featured_button_text}}

The Montana Senate voted down a bill Monday that would have allowed private reimbursement to wolf trappers.

Senators voted 27-22 against House Bill 279 brought by Rep. Bob Brown, R-Thompson Falls. Seven Republicans voted with Democrats to defeat the bill, with the body then voting to indefinitely postpone the legislation.

The bill would have allowed private payment for expenses to trappers that legally harvest a wolf in Montana.

Brown said he brought the bill due in part to interest by the Foundation for Wildlife Management, a group operating in Idaho that solicits donations for payment of harvested wolves in that state. Concern from elk and deer hunters about populations in northwest Montana also inspired the bill, he said.

HB 279 saw strong debate in the House and Senate before Monday’s vote.

Supporters believed the bill would help address regions in Montana with high wolf populations and to target wolves threatening livestock.

Opponents denounced HB 279 as instituting a bounty on wolves, which they believed crossed ethical lines.

You have free articles remaining.

Become a Member

Those themes carried onto the Senate floor where senators spoke out on both sides of the issue.

“This is not a bounty, a bounty is indiscriminate,” Sen. Jennifer Fielder, R-Thompson Fall, told the body. Trapping typically has a higher success rate than hunting especially in northwest Montana, she said, but catching the animals is difficult and expensive.

Sen. Jason Ellsworth, R-Hamilton, also supported the bill, pointing out that management decisions including quotas would remain with Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks.

Be the first to know - Sign up for Breaking News

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

But Sen. Jill Cohenour, D-East Helena, noted that the bill amended the section of law dealing with prizes for hunting, such as big buck contests. She also pointed to testimony by FWP, which in part noted that trappers could be paid under the current law if it is based on “effort” rather than per animal taken.

Sen. Pat Flowers, D-Bozeman, said he saw several problems with the bill, including both enforcement and diminishing the role of FWP in managing wolves.

“This bill takes the agency out of the process – I don’t believe it’s time to take the management of wolves over to private enterprise,” he said.

Sen. Mike Phillips, D-Bozeman, a wildlife biologist, noted that elk and deer numbers are largely driven by habitat, saying that wolves are not the “boogeyman” they are often made out to be.

Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Reporter Tom Kuglin can be reached at 447-4076 @IR_TomKuglin

0
0
0
0
0

Natural Resources Reporter

Natural Resources Reporter / Assistant Editor for The Independent Record.

Load comments