Try 1 month for $5

Folks in the West love our public lands, and for many reasons; the ample places to hunt, fish, camp, hike, ride and otherwise enjoy the great outdoors are a significant reason they choose to live, work and raise our families where we do.

That’s just one segment of our cherished way of life that was on the line during the recent election. To folks on the coasts, it may seem insignificant, but to most people in the Rocky Mountain West these are integral parts of our heritage. And it was on our minds in the ballot box.

President-elect Donald Trump expressed openness to keeping the lands great on the campaign trail when asked if he supported plans to transfer nationally owned lands to states. Let’s hope he continues that approach because there’s a lot at stake.

Let’s also hope that the leaders of the American Lands Council -- the principal lobby group supporting land seizure -- and its current CEO, Montana state Sen. Jennifer Fielder, who recently published an opinion in this newspaper, follow his lead in this respect.

The transfer of those lands would jeopardize the significant value our public lands offer our families, communities and local economies. Montanans understand this -- in our state 4 out of 5 people utilize public lands and even more know that they create jobs and opportunities in the burgeoning outdoor and tourism economy. Not surprisingly, Montana counties with significant amounts of federal lands have been found to outperform those with smaller shares of federal lands.

The dreams of Jennifer Fielder and the ALC is for local counties and states to take over what is currently public land, owned by all U.S. taxpayers, and managed by the federal government. In their pie-in-the-sky scenario, more revenue can be culled from our public lands through more aggressive logging, mining, grazing and development of these lands for direct revenue generation. This, they say, will leave counties and states flush with cash.

Unfortunately, they couldn’t be more wrong: Transferring public lands to local jurisdictions means transferring the management responsibilities -- and the significant management costs -- as well.

The cost of forest fire suppression by federal agencies alone has ballooned in recent years, surpassing $2 billion in 2015, when agencies battled almost 70,000 individual fires. The U.S. Forest Service projects that by 2025, over 67 percent of its budget will be spent on fire suppression, up from over 50 percent in 2015 and a mere 16 percent in 1995. States and counties simply do not have the funding, expertise or equipment to manage the increasing occurrence of fires and protect these lands.

Subscribe to Breaking News

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

What’s more is that a report from the bipartisan Conference of Western Attorneys General recently dismissed claims made by proponents of the land seizure movement that the United States is legally obligated to transfer public lands to the states.

Elections are a valued part of our democracy. Let’s hope that Sen. Fielder follows President-elect Trump’s openness to keeping our valued public lands in public hands for us all to enjoy. And we stand ready to work with them both to accomplish this. 

Chris Saeger of Whitefish is the director of Western Values Project, a nonprofit public lands advocacy organization.

Subscribe to Breaking News

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

 

0
0
0
0
0

Load comments