UM, city sign pact to address student housing, quality of life issues

2012-12-10T17:57:00Z UM, city sign pact to address student housing, quality of life issuesBy MARTIN KIDSTON Missoulian Helena Independent Record
December 10, 2012 5:57 pm  • 

MISSOULA -- Missoula city officials and the University of Montana agreed Monday to address a wide range of issues aimed at improving the quality of life in campus neighborhoods and the city’s downtown core.

Mayor John Engen, along with UM President Royce Engstrom and student body president Zack Brown, signed the “Community Quality of Life Initiative,” which sets forth a list of ambitious goals ranging from increased student housing to downtown parking.

“The city of Missoula and the university are inextricable,” Engen said. “We matter to each other, and we would not be the same without each other. So together, we’re going to work on planning together.”

The commitment binds Missoula and UM in a collaborative effort to see 1,000 new units of student housing built near the university within two years. The housing would likely be built near UM through a private-public partnership.

“We don’t have to build it, but we can be instrumental in making sure it gets built,” Engen said. “We’re committed over the course of the next two years to make sure there are 1,000 units of new housing available for students.”

Also addressed in the commitment is the city’s desire to win from the 2013 Legislature the authority to inspect existing residential rental properties for safety. And the commitment directs the city and UM to establish alternatives for downtown parking.

“We need to work collectively on transportation and parking issues,” Engen said. “We use remarkably valuable real estate around the university and downtown Missoula to park single occupancy vehicles. We think there’s a better way to do business.”

The commitment also joins Missoula and UM in addressing longstanding issues in the University District neighborhood.

Additional efforts will be made to address speeding, parties, underage drinking, litter and parking, while holding landlords accountable for the condition of their property.

“We need to apply more resources, officers and civilians throughout our community to deal with quality of life,” Engen said. “Those range from how to manage parties in neighborhoods, dogs off leash, garbage and litter. We have the beginnings of a program and will flesh that out.”

Engstrom called the commitment profound and long overdue. The agreement, he said, directs the university and the city to focus efforts and resources to make Missoula a better place to live.

“Living in a university town brings with it all kinds of benefits,” Engstrom said. “It also brings some challenges with it. This commitment makes a strong statement that we as a university and we as the city of Missoula want to come together and make this a model university community.”

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. steeline
    Report Abuse
    steeline - December 11, 2012 5:49 am
    Being a landlord in a college town leaves a lot to be desired. There is a lot of damage done to rental property by the college kids. I am not saying all kids damage property but those that do do it well. There are some landlords that don't take care of their rentals and over charge for dumps. A 1,000 new units will put the squeeze on the "slum lords" and force them to keep their rentals up to a decient standard. Additional rental units could affect the rental rates from a supply stand point. I would much rather have my kid rent a decient and clean place than some of the other places that are available.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick