get it home page promo

Supreme Court rejects Beach request for rehearing

2013-06-21T15:00:00Z 2014-04-23T17:11:31Z Supreme Court rejects Beach request for rehearingThe Associated Press The Associated Press
June 21, 2013 3:00 pm  • 

The Montana Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request from Barry Beach to reconsider its decision last month to send him back to prison for the 1979 murder of a classmate after he spent 1 ½ years as a free man awaiting a new trial.

The court issued a ruling Thursday that sticks with its decision to reject a lower court decision granting Beach a new trial. The high court split 4-3 in both decisions.

Beach advocates have long argued that he has been wrongly imprisoned for 100 years with no chance of parole for a murder they say was the result of an out-of-control fight among jealous girls.

The 51-year-old Beach was living a quiet life in Billings with a job and a house when he was ordered back to prison. His supporters have vowed to continue the legal fight, and didn't expect the Supreme Court would reverse itself so quickly.

Beach's argument to the Supreme Court said the 4-3 majority wrongly discarded a lower court judge's findings from a 2011 hearing and established a new standard of review in the case. Beach's lawyers argued that the high court overlooked discrepancies in Beach's original confession that was used to convict him.

Beach argues the confession was coerced by out-of-state detectives who had picked him up on an unrelated crime.

But the majority of the justices said in their Thursday order that Beach failed to prove innocence and instead relied on hearsay and unproven theories to argue for a new trial. The court said it can only consider rehearing it if it overlooked some "fact material to the decision."

"The facts established by evidence in the record were properly reviewed," the justices wrote in the brief order.

A minority opinion said the lower court properly followed the Montana Supreme Court's instructions in determining a new trial was warranted. They argued the court should have allowed a new trial to proceed.

Over the years, Beach's request to be freed have been rejected in courts and by an executive clemency panel that issued a stern ruling that he had been properly convicted.

Backers say there could be a way to pursue further claims in federal court.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. DeltaEpsilonKappa
    Report Abuse
    DeltaEpsilonKappa - June 21, 2013 6:42 pm
    After watching and reading everything I could about this case I feel he deserves a retrial.

    March Racicot isn't going to let that happen however.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Independent Record

Great Helena Businesses

Clipped From The Newspaper