State will offer opinion on EPA rules

2013-09-25T00:00:00Z 2013-09-25T00:16:03Z State will offer opinion on EPA rulesBy MIKE DENNISON IR State Bureau Helena Independent Record
September 25, 2013 12:00 am  • 

Montana’s top environmental official said Tuesday the state will weigh in on proposed greenhouse-gas emission rules for new coal-fired power plants — but noted that Montana has a law that already imposes strict standards.

“It looks as though (the federal) rule is a little weaker than Montana’s,” said Tracy Stone-Manning, director of the state Department of Environmental Quality.

“We’re analyzing the draft rule now to understand it, and see how it could affect future (power plants) in Montana,” she continued. “We’ll take part in the rule-making to make sure that our voice is heard and that our economy and environment are not harmed.”

Montana doesn’t have any new coal-fired power plants proposed at this time, but it does have several existing plants.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Friday unveiled proposed greenhouse-gas emission standards for new coal-fired power plants.

The proposal would limit carbon-dioxide emissions to 1,100 pounds per megawatt-hour of produced power. Carbon-dioxide is the primary greenhouse gas, which climate scientists say are a major cause of global warming.

Stone-Manning said the rule would mean an approximate 40 percent reduction in carbon produced by a new plant, compared to current plants.

But a 2007 Montana law says until the state or federal government adopt carbon-capture standards, state utility regulators cannot approve utility acquisition of a coal-fired power plant that doesn’t capture at least 50 percent of its carbon emissions.

The provision was inserted into a 2007 bill that re-regulated Montana’s electric utility industry, 10 years after deregulation and restructuring.

State Sen. Alan Olson, R-Roundup, a lead sponsor of the bill, said Senate Democrats in 2007 insisted on inclusion of the carbon-capture language. Democrats held a two-vote majority in the Senate that year.

Olson said Tuesday he wasn’t wild about the provision, but “if that’s what it was going to take (to pass the bill), I guess I was willing to compromise.”

Stone-Manning said once the EPA’s proposed rule on new plant emissions is published in the federal register, there will be 60 days to comment on it.

Supporters of coal development in Montana criticized the EPA proposal on new coal-plant emissions, saying the government shouldn’t be putting new obstacles in the way of coal.

“This means we’re not going to build any new coal plants in this country,” said Chuck Denowh, spokesman for Count on Coal Montana, a coalition of interests supporting coal development. “For a state like Montana that has more coal in the ground than anyone else, that’s bad news.”

Denowh said the rule, if adopted, would be requiring coal-fired power plants to have carbon-capture technology that isn’t commercially ready. The EPA should allow for more time to develop the technology to capture carbon, he said.

Denowh said coal supporters also are worried about EPA’s upcoming rules on carbon emission for existing coal-fired plants.

Stone-Manning said the state should have more say over how the existing-plant rules are implemented, because they’ll be under a different section of the Clean Air Act than the new-plant rules.

Copyright 2016 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. waterunderground
    Report Abuse
    waterunderground - September 25, 2013 2:33 pm
    Ha Ha Ha Otis, that's a good one. Maybe you have 60% more ice in your martini in 2013 than in 2012, but the ice caps are not getting any larger. Actually the latest assessment from the IPCC is that the sea level rise will be around 3-feet by end of the century, greater than previously predicted and with a greater level of confidence. Have a look at the consensus of international scienttists rather than Fox News.
  2. otis mule
    Report Abuse
    otis mule - September 25, 2013 6:12 am
    Even though the latest data shows that the climate has not changed a bit in the last 15 years. Sadly, the Arctic ice cap is 60% larger at the end of Summer 2013 than at the end of Summer 2012. This, after enviros predicted the complete disappearance of the ice cap in 2013 with much hand wringing and regulatory glee. Stoic in the face of these disappointments, the enviros continue to evangelize the masses, baptizing in the name of Gaia, Smokey, and the Holy Chevy Volt.
    High Priestess Tracy Stone-Manning proudly compares the Federal job killing law to Montana's job killing law and pronounces Montana's law stronger. Be proud, Montana, and get to work. You no longer have to work those long hours at the plant or the mines, miserable in your destruction of the Planet. Pack you lunch for part time job #2, waiting table, cleaning rooms, serving the Saviors who have purchased our timber, our ranches, and our farms, for Nature. And the MEIC looked out at it was good. People were broke, and they needed the Government. Amen.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick