get it home page promo

Montana supporters, opponents of Keystone XL oil pipeline parse Obama’s comments

2013-06-27T00:00:00Z 2013-06-27T00:26:45Z Montana supporters, opponents of Keystone XL oil pipeline parse Obama’s commentsBy MIKE DENNISON IR State Bureau Helena Independent Record
June 27, 2013 12:00 am  • 

President Barack Obama’s comments Tuesday on the future of the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline gave hope to both pipeline supporters and opponents — or, depending on how you look at it, didn’t clear up anything.

On Wednesday, some supporters of the pipeline that would carry Canadian crude oil from the Alberta tar sands to refineries near the Gulf Coast, via Montana, said Obama’s comments indicate its construction will be approved by the U.S. State Department.

Obama, during a landmark speech on climate-change policies, said the 1,700-mile pipeline would be approved if it doesn’t “significantly exacerbate” greenhouse-gas emissions.

Russ Girling, president and CEO of TransCanada, the Canadian firm proposing the pipeline, said several environmental reviews have shown that Keystone won’t increase greenhouse-gas emissions.

“TransCanada is pleased with the president’s guidance to the State Department, as the almost five-year review of the project has already repeatedly found that these criteria are satisfied,” he said.

Montana Sens. Jon Tester and Max Baucus, both Democrats and both pipeline supporters, said the same thing — that environmental reviews have said building the pipeline won’t increase carbon emissions.

“The president just confirmed what I’ve been saying for years: It’s time to build the Keystone pipeline,” Baucus said. “By his own definition, there are no more excuses left.”

But a leading Montana opponent of the pipeline said Wednesday it will increase greenhouse gas emissions, and if the president meant what he said, the pipeline should be rejected.

Anne Hedges, program director for the Montana Environmental Information Center, said the pipeline would enable more development of the Alberta tar sands — and that tar sand oil production is a huge carbon emitter.

“You can’t develop the tar sands and address climate change at the same time,” she said. “Based on what (the president) said, you cannot approve Keystone. … It is not in the national interest.”

A spokesman for Montana’s petroleum industry said Wednesday there’s no reason the Keystone XL pipeline shouldn’t be built and that it would help producers near the Montana-North Dakota border transport some of their oil as well.

But Dexter Busby, acting president of the Montana Petroleum Association, said he’s not sure what to make of Obama’s comments, noting they could cut either way.

Busby, however, disagreed with Hedges on whether stopping the pipeline would negatively affect tar sand development.

“That oil is going to move, whether Keystone is built or not, whether it be by truck or rail or tanker,” he said. “(The pipeline) is just a better option.”

One Montana pipeline supporter saw the president’s comments on Keystone as a negative.

U.S. Rep. Steve Daines, a Republican, said Tuesday that Obama’s speech amounted to “waging a war on American energy,” and that the president is “imposing further barriers to the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline.”

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Activate subscription button gif
Subscribe to Email Newsletters

Breaking news, contests, morning headlines and more. Sign up for updates from the Independent Record

Follow the Independent Record

Great Helena Businesses

Clipped From The Newspaper