In the six days between a judge tossing out Montana's campaign contribution limits and an appellate court reinstating them, the Montana Republican Party dumped $500,000 into Rick Hill's campaign in the former congressman's tight race for governor.

Hill's opponent, Democrat Steve Bullock, called Hill's acceptance of the donation a crime and filed a complaint with the state commissioner of political practices Wednesday.

The state GOP also donated $32,000 to attorney general candidate Tim Fox in that time, and tried but failed to assemble donors for Sandy Welch, the Republican trying to unseat Office of Public Instruction Superintendent Denise Juneau, said Bowen Greenwood, executive director of the state Republican Party, on Wednesday.

The amounts donated are far above the limits set on contributions from political parties. A candidate for governor, for instance, is limited to accepting a maximum of $22,600 from all political party committees. An individual can only donate up to $630 to a gubernatorial candidate.

But U.S. District Judge Charles Lovell ruled on Oct. 3 the limits are unconstitutional, saying they are too low to allow effective campaigning. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated them six days later, but for that period of time the state had no contribution limits, Greenwood said.

"We don't make the laws here, we just follow them. At the time, that was the law," Greenwood said. "Supporting pro-jobs candidate is what we do here, so of course we donated to Rick Hill."

The Hill campaign has no qualms about accepting the money. Campaign manager Brock Lowrance said the donation would be spent but declined to say how.

"The law is unconstitutional and remains unconstitutional," Lowrance said. "It was a legal contribution. It shouldn't be a surprise that the Montana Republican Party is going to support its nominee for governor."

Bullock's campaign filed a complaint with the commissioner of political practices, which oversees campaign finance reporting for state candidates. The attorney general also said he may file another complaint in court with the aim of blocking Hill from using the money before the Nov. 6 election.

Lovell's ruling only briefly prevented the commissioner from enforcing the campaign contribution limits, and it didn't give candidates the right to accept such donations, Bullock said. Violation of state election laws is a misdemeanor crime.

"It shows that he's going to go to any level, including taking illegal contributions, to win the election," Bullock said of Hill. "This is a serious violation. It's a $500,000 violation of Montana's laws. There certainly could be implications beyond the election."

Bullock said his campaign has not accepted any contributions above the limits.

News of the donations set off a flurry of activity at the Office of the Commissioner of Political Practices. Commissioner Jim Murry said he and his staff were meeting with their attorneys to discuss the matter, including whether the candidates can keep the donations.

On Oct. 5, the same day the GOP made its donation to Hill, Murry sent a letter recommending that contributors and candidates abide by the limits until the 9th Circuit made its ruling.

"We're going to have to wait and see as this plays out," Murry said. "It would have been better if everyone had followed that recommendation."

It is unclear whether any, or how many, legislative candidates raised money beyond their contribution limits during that six-day period.

Campaign finance reports for the period from Sept. 6 until Wednesday for candidates for statewide office aren't due until Monday. But the $500,000 donation to Hill surfaced in a draft report released by his campaign Wednesday in an apparent response to the Bullock campaign's request to inspect those figures.

Hill's individual donors amounted to more than $175,000 for the period and included at least eight people who donated more than $630 apiece. Two individuals, Cynthia Huempfner of Bozeman and David Schuett of Dillon, each donated $2,000.

Lowrance emphasized the report is a draft and some individuals' donations could change before Monday's filing deadline.

Lowrance said Bullock faced only a "straw-man primary opponent" so he could raise more money, and this donation levels the field.

Bullock defeated Heather Margolis of Helena in the June primary with 87 percent of the vote. Hill defeated multiple opponents in a hard-fought primary.

Greenwood disclosed that the state GOP donated to Fox's campaign. He said the party was not able to assemble the donors to contribute to Welch, "so that didn't happen."

Fox spokesman Tyler Matthews said in an email that the party donated $32,000 on Oct. 8. He said the campaign would be looking to the courts for guidance about the donation, and added that Fox would post all his donors online within 24 hours of accepting a contribution.

The GOP donation was among 18 pages of contributors listed on Fox's website Wednesday.

Fox is facing Democrat Pam Bucy in the campaign to replace Bullock as attorney general.

Greenwood declined to say where the state party received the cash infusion. As of Aug. 31, the most recent date available, the state party had just $64,450.06 in the bank, according to a Federal Election Commission filing.

"The exact source of donations will be available in our next report," he said.

The next party finance reporting deadline is Oct. 25.

(2) comments


IS ANYBODY EVEN SLIGHTLY SURPRISE BY THIS NONSENSE?? I hope the right is proud of their leaders...sue to get a law revoked, slip the money in under the table and then pretend it's all good.



I hope Steve doesn't lose his temper over this...

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.