Circ activation contest

Judge upholds block on more bison moves

2012-04-12T00:00:00Z Judge upholds block on more bison moves Helena Independent Record
April 12, 2012 12:00 am

CHINOOK (AP) — Wild bison transported last month from Yellowstone National Park will remain at northeastern Montana’s Fort Peck Indian Reservation, but a judge ruled Wednesday that no additional bison can be transferred in the state for at least 30 days.

Montana District Judge John McKeon upheld a restraining order barring further bison relocations after an eight-hour hearing challenging the state’s return of the animals to tribal lands.

More than 60 bison from Yellowstone National Park were relocated to the Fort Peck Indian Reservation in March. Half of those bison are slated to be transferred to the Fort Belknap Reservation, but property rights groups, ranchers and some state lawmakers have filed a lawsuit in opposition to the move.

They say bison could spread disease, knock down fences and eat hay meant for cattle.

Before the hearing began, the plaintiffs withdrew a request to send the bison at Fort Peck back to a quarantine facility near Yellowstone National Park.

The Havre Daily News reports that McKeon will come to a final decision on future bison relocations in the next 30 days, and until then a restraining order on additional transfers will remain in place.

Cory Swanson, the ranchers’ attorney, said he was encouraged by the ruling.

“The fact that he has taken 30 days to carefully consider this is great,” Swanson said. “We’re happy that for the next 30 days we are safe.”

Defense attorney Timothy Preso of Bozeman-based environmental law firm Earthjustice said that the judge’s decision was not a surprise.

“He’s basically maintaining the status quo until he makes his final decision,” Preso said.

The landowners say that state Fish, Wildlife and Parks officials violated a law passed last year that required FWP to come up with a bison management plan before relocating bison.

The defense responded that FWP drafted agreements with the tribes, which are sovereign nations, so that law did not apply.


Information from: Havre Daily News,

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. Outlaw
    Report Abuse
    Outlaw - April 12, 2012 10:15 am
    "The defense responded that FWP drafted agreements with the tribes, which are sovereign nations, so that law did not apply." This is good, so why do the "sovereign nations" have representation in the Montana house and senate?

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick