Sources: Schweitzer very likely US Senate candidate

Baucus’ seat | Ex-gov says only ‘maybe’
2013-06-16T00:10:00Z 2015-08-13T13:36:41Z Sources: Schweitzer very likely US Senate candidate By MIKE DENNISON IR State Bureau Helena Independent Record
June 16, 2013 12:10 am  • 

Former Gov. Brian Schweitzer is laying the groundwork to run for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Sen. Max Baucus in Montana, and looks very much like a candidate, sources have told the Lee Newspapers State Bureau.

Schweitzer, 57, a Democrat, was in Washington, D.C., last week, meeting with labor and conservation groups that traditionally support Democrats, talking about the Senate race and what assistance the groups could offer.

“I would be shocked if he didn’t announce (soon) that he’s a candidate,” said one Democratic insider, who declined to be quoted by name.

Schweitzer, in a telephone interview Friday evening, said while he’s been actively exploring whether to run, he hasn’t made a final decision.

He said it’s a difficult decision, and he’s not sure he wants to give up his post-political life of living on Georgetown Lake to get back into the political fray of Washington, D.C. — and take a substantial pay cut.

“The question is, can you make a difference?” he said. “I don’t know that a lot of people back there are even trying to make a difference. … That’s a demerit.”

Schweitzer said he knows he has to decide “pretty soon,” and vows he will.

Montana State political scientist David Parker, who’s writing a book about Montana’s 2012 Senate race between Sen. Jon Tester and former U.S. Rep. Denny Rehberg, said late last week his Democratic sources believe Schweitzer is preparing to run.

“It’s a silver-platter opportunity,” Parker said of the open U.S. Senate seat created by Baucus’s retirement. “It would be stupid politically not to do it. And if there’s one thing we know about Brian Schweitzer, it’s that he’s not stupid politically. …

“It was clear to me, when he was in Bozeman on campus (this spring), that he has the chops and is still interested in being influential.”

Baucus, 71, announced April 23 he would not run for a seventh consecutive U.S. Senate term in 2014. The veteran Democrat said he wants to spend more time with his family and enjoy life in his native state.

By then, two Republicans already were running for the Baucus seat: Former state Sen. Corey Stapleton, a financial planner from Billings who ran unsuccessfully for governor last year, and state Rep. Champ Edmunds, a Missoula banker.

Other Republicans considering the race include U.S. Rep. Steve Daines and Ryan Zinke, a former state senator and retired Navy Seal commander from Whitefish.

Schweitzer, whose term as governor ended in January, said in April he wouldn’t rule out a run for the open seat but was busy then working with a New York-based hedge fund to take control of the Stillwater Mining Co. in Montana.

The successful takeover bid occurred in early May, with Schweitzer becoming the Montana mining company’s chairman of the board.

Schweitzer also has spoken dismissively of Congress and the U.S. Senate, saying last year he’s “not goofy enough to be in the House and not senile enough to be in the Senate.”

But since then, Schweitzer has been taking all the steps that candidates take, sources said, assembling his potential political team and talking to political consultants and groups that would support him financially and organizationally.

He’s even been in touch with political people close to Baucus — with whom he hasn’t had the warmest relationship — asking if they might help in the race.

One left-leaning group also isn’t waiting for Schweitzer to get in, before actively supporting him. The Progressive Change Campaign Committee, a political-action committee based in Washington, D.C., is leading an active “draft Schweitzer” movement, rounding up money and supporters.

The group’s co-founder, Adam Green, visited with Schweitzer in Montana in May, and the group is buying Internet ads in Montana saying “Draft Brian Schweitzer for Senate!”

So far, PCCC has raised $29,000 dedicated to helping the Schweitzer Senate campaign, signed up 415 people who say they’ll work as volunteers on the campaign and had nearly 18,300 people sign an on-line petition urging Schweitzer to run.

Group spokesman Matt Wall said the group aims to raise $50,000 for Schweitzer, and that the money is being held in escrow by Act Blue, a Democratic fund-raising group, until Schweitzer officially becomes a candidate.

The same group raised $100,000 in 2011 in urging Massachusetts Democrat Elizabeth Warren to run for a U.S. Senate seat. She challenged and defeated Republican Sen. Scott Brown in 2012.

“That’s kind of the same model that we’re following with Brian Schweitzer,” Wall said. “So, if he gets into this race, he’ll be able to hire staff and hit the ground running.”

However, Wall also acknowledged that PCCC has mounted “draft” campaigns for candidates who ultimately decided not to run, for various reasons.

Most top-ranking Democrats in Montana clearly expect Schweitzer to get in the race soon. Sen. Jon Tester, talking to NBC White House correspondent Chuck Todd on MSNBC Thursday, said he doesn’t bet the farm on many things, “but I’d bet the farm (Schweitzer) is running.”

Copyright 2016 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. WalleyeHunter
    Report Abuse
    WalleyeHunter - June 30, 2013 9:10 pm
    The Senate is supposed to be the "higher Chamber." It is supposed to be the deliberative body that involves itself in treaties, apporval of cabinet officials, etc. The Senate's rules are such that it only takes one person to halt the process of lawmaking. Think about what this man could do with that kind of power - he hasn't spent much of his political career needing to work with others who disagree with him.

    This man does not deliberate, he rams things down other people's throats. His temper, and his propensity for a nasty fight, make him a better fit for the House if anything at all.

    I am a huge fan of Jon Tester. I ave a high degree of respect for Steve Daines as well even if I did not vote for him . I probably would vote for Daines in the future given his relative moderacy compared to others in the House, and the fact that he does not go lock-step with his party leadership. He also displays a streak of advocacy for common sense conservation action .

    However, if Schweitzer is the choice for US Senator on the Democratic side, I will take my vote elsewhere. I have seen this man's rants, both in public and behind closed doors, and they are unacceptable and unbecoming a Senator.
  2. caribouboy
    Report Abuse
    caribouboy - June 17, 2013 5:18 am
    In the least surprising news ever....
  3. ranyne
    Report Abuse
    ranyne - June 16, 2013 11:31 am
    I guess that means that by his own words, he has become more goofy and or senile. Watch your vote.
  4. Jason Smith
    Report Abuse
    Jason Smith - June 16, 2013 7:01 am
    Best thing to happen to Montana, and has my support all the way. Someone true to himself...not a sheeple!

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick