Daines amendments focus on forest fires, mismanagement

2013-08-01T00:00:00Z 2013-08-01T13:35:25Z Daines amendments focus on forest fires, mismanagementBy ROB CHANEY Missoulian Helena Independent Record
August 01, 2013 12:00 am  • 

Rep. Steve Daines, R-Mont., got two amendments attached to legislation intended to speed up timber harvests on national forest land during a House committee session on Wednesday.

One amendment to the Restoring Healthy Forests for Healthy Communities Act requires the U.S. Forest Service give priority to forests bordering Indian reservation land in need of hazardous fuels reduction in accordance with the Tribal Forest Protection Act of 2004. In a press release, Daines said the agency has failed to follow the earlier legislation, which has put tribal lands at risk from wildfires starting on adjacent national forests.

The second would give the Forest Service more authority to deny appeals of projects it uses under its categorical exclusion rule. Categorical exclusions are intended for small-scale or repetitive actions that shouldn’t need full-scale agency analysis before approval.

“Without this provision, decisions on important, low-impact projects conducted by the Forest Service which were once completed in five to 10 days will continue to be delayed by at least 30 days, and in some cases, up to 145 days,” Daines said in his release.

The bill passed passed the House Natural Resources Committee on Wednesday and is now headed for a vote before the full House of Representatives.

“As a fifth-generation Montana, I know too well how devastating wildfires and the mismanagement of our National Forests can be to our communities, our state’s economy and the health of our forests,” Daines wrote. “This bill will help create thousands of long-term jobs, protect our environment for future generations, allow tribes, local counties and states to have more input in forest management, and renew the federal government’s commitment to our rural counties.”

Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., authored the Restoring Healthy Forests for Healthy Communities Act (HR 1526). Daines is one of 18 co-sponsors. The bill would require the Forest Service to produce at last half the sustainable yield of timber each year and share 25 percent of its revenues with local county governments. It would also streamline National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act analyses of projects.

In Montana, money coming through the now-expired Secure Rural Schools funding from timber sales totaled $22 million in 2011. That included $1.8 million to Flathead County, $5 million to Lincoln County and $1 million to Mineral County.

“While much of our forests are suitable for harvesting, we still face community-threatening wildfires each summer and almost 10 percent unemployment in Ravalli County,” Ravalli County Commissioner Greg Chilcott said of Daines’ amendments in an email. “There is much that can be done to better manage our forests, create jobs, and protect our communities from wildfires while assuring local governments have resources they need to best serve the public.”

Copyright 2016 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editor@helenair.com. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick