State land funds matter to schools

2011-09-15T00:00:00Z State land funds matter to schoolsBy Mary Sexton - IR Your Turn Helena Independent Record
September 15, 2011 12:00 am  • 

In a recent IR opinion piece, leaders of two Montana education associations questioned the accuracy of statements by DNRC officials regarding how state trust revenues support K-12 education. While it may serve their purpose to vilify a state agency in an attempt to provide more funds for schools, Montanans would be better served by working together, in a truthful and factual way, to improve our schools and our complicated school funding formula.

Trust land dollars represent the cornerstone of funding for our schools — and DNRC officials know that very well. The largest beneficiaries are the “common schools,” or K-12 students, which on average receive 90 percent of all revenues generated. In a typical year, that’s $60 million. In 2010, trust land revenues for common schools represented 19 percent of the state’s share of base funding for K-12 education.

Dollars that come from managing state trust lands are the first dollars dedicated to fund schools, followed by funds from the general fund. General fund dollars consist of taxes paid by all Montanans. In other words, if the legislature appropriates $100 to educate students in Montana and $20 is generated from state trust lands, then the other $80 must come from the general fund. Without that $20 (actually $133.3 million in 2010) from state trust lands, there are only two other options. First, school funding would necessarily be decreased by a like amount (the students only get $80 in our example). The second option would be to raise taxes on Montanans to fund the additional $20 to ensure our students receive the full $100 necessary for their education.

It is important to remember that levels of K-12 funding are legislative decisions determined by revenue estimates and other state considerations. Trust land revenues are included in those revenue estimates and function as a rising tide, providing direct funding to education while at the same time providing options for elected officials to float other boats such as health insurance so children can go to school healthy and well, or public safety services to ensure our kids live and learn in a safe environment.

While about 90 percent of trust revenues go to K-12 education, other educational institutions also receive revenues from the management of their lands. The Montana University System (Montana Tech, UM, MSU, UM-Western, MSU-Billings) receive the second largest distribution of revenues. Unlike the K-12 system, the dollars distributed to the university system are not guaranteed by the general fund. If revenues fall short on their trust lands, the Montana University System simply does without the money, but in K-12 education, the general fund and taxpayers make up the difference. Why would the Montana School Boards Association and the Montana Rural Education Association question such a good thing?

Not only does the management of state trust lands support funding for 12 different beneficiary groups, the management of the land supports jobs and livelihoods for our loggers, construction workers, ranchers, farmers, engineers, miners, oil and gas operators, outfitters and guides. Additionally, the management of these trust lands provides access to nearly 4 million acres on which to hunt, fish, hike, camp, and otherwise recreate.

So, if you’re wondering whether or not revenues generated from managing state trust lands matter to education in Montana, they most certainly do. State trust lands’ revenues are an essential part of ensuring that Montana’s children receive a quality education.

Mary Sexton is the Director of the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation.

Copyright 2016 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick