get it home page promo

Lighted nocks are no panacea for Montana bow hunting

2013-02-14T00:00:00Z Lighted nocks are no panacea for Montana bow huntingJoelle Selk Montana Bowhunters Association Helena Helena Independent Record

Several opinion pieces have recently focused on lighted nock use for hunting arrows. None of these authors contacted the Montana Bowhunters Association, the statewide leadership organization for bow hunters, to ask why we oppose lighted nocks. Rather, they opted to paint bow hunters as irresponsible, unethical sportsmen who wound countless big game animals and who absolutely need lighted nocks to recover animals.

Proponents of lighted nocks state that bow hunting has inordinately high wounding rates. They cite a wounding figure of about 50 percent, typically derived from anecdotal sources. In contrast, valid studies show a wounding rate of 13 to 18 percent, similar to that of rifle wounding (Camp Ripley study by Krueger, et. al. and Indian Head study by Pedersen, et. al.). One of the related findings of Pedersen’s study was that there was no difference in deer recovery metrics between compound bow and crossbow users (Pedersen, p. 31). Based upon these findings, there is clearly no advantage in allowing increased technology in order to reduce wounding rates. In fact, no studies exist which show that lighted nocks improve recovery.

The Medway Plantation study conducted in 1993 by Morton et. al. revealed a 98percent recovery rate, and cited “careful shot placement and shooting skill” as the two most important components to bow hunting success. Bow hunter education promotes these values and teaches discipline and persistence in tracking to ensure successful recovery. These qualities are far more important to ethical bow hunting than finding the “perfect” piece of technology.

There is one point made by Mr. Flynn in his Feb. 4 piece with which we can agree: the Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission has the authority to determine which equipment is appropriate to bow hunting, and that governing body should be allowed to do so. The solution doesn’t come from squandering the legislature’s time; it comes from an honest assessment by sportsmen and women of what is essential to ethical bow hunting.

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. Curmudgeon
    Report Abuse
    Curmudgeon - February 15, 2013 11:58 am
    I agree with Elk Slayer and Steeline: has Joelle Selk and MBA presented any REAL reasons why lighted nocks should NOT be allowed?

    I don't think so. They should go to a dictionary or Google and look up "Luddite".
  2. steeline
    Report Abuse
    steeline - February 14, 2013 8:22 pm
    Right on friend.
  3. FlamingLiberal1
    Report Abuse
    FlamingLiberal1 - February 14, 2013 1:58 pm
    I agree with ElkSlayer. Lighted nocks don't do anything to improve the chances of a hunter making a kill. They simply provide a little help in the retrieval of an arrow or downed game. I fail to see why this is even a controversy. It has nothing to do with fair chase.
  4. ElkSlayer
    Report Abuse
    ElkSlayer - February 14, 2013 11:30 am
    I don't agree with Montana Bowhunters Association on this. I've hunted with a bow since 2005 and have lost arrows on each hunt from strong winds or misjudged distances to tall grass. Regardless, I'm not perfect, no one is. Every time I lose an arrow it costs me roughly $25 with all the components included to make an arrow. I would like to recover these arrows, if possible, and I believe a lighted nock would have helped in each case. I don't believe lighted nocks make you shoot better anyway. That is something only practice will help with. I don't understand the primitive thinking either. We all rush out and buy the latest gadgets to take an animal down humanely either with a gun or bow. Imagine gun hunters being told they can't use scopes or rangefinders. Why don't they go back to muzzle loaders as the only approved weapon or long bows for that matter? I'll tell you why. The manufacturers would go broke and more American jobs would be lost. Nobody wants that. This whole matter is ridiculous. It shouldn't even be an issue but stupid is as stupid does.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Independent Record

Great Helena Businesses