get it home page promo

Bucy may have lobbied against gun rights

2012-10-05T01:11:00Z Bucy may have lobbied against gun rightsBrad Tschida Missoula Helena Independent Record
October 05, 2012 1:11 am  • 

It’s extremely hypocritical for attorney general candidate Pam Bucy to attempt to deceive us on her “alleged” support for gun rights. In 2009, as a lobbyist, she took money to fight a bill (HB 228) that allowed people to use firearms to defend their homes. Even Gov. Brian Schweitzer supported this bill. Apparently, Bucy’s true intentions are to keep Montanans disarmed when it comes to defending ourselves, our homes, and our families.

I support Tim Fox for attorney general because he will truly and rigorously defend our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Because of her record as a lobbyist, Bucy cannot be trusted. She fought against our gun rights when, as a lobbyist, someone offered her enough money (her 30 pieces of silver). We can’t afford to support a person making promises to the special interest groups financing her campaign on one hand and then telling a different story in public. It’s deceitful, at the least.

It’s time for honesty in our elected officials. I knew Tim Fox in college and he’s even a better man today. Check him out and you’ll confirm my clains. He’s the right type of man to get our state back on track.

Copyright 2014 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(8) Comments

  1. MTLiberty
    Report Abuse
    MTLiberty - October 06, 2012 8:37 am
    Pam Bucy received a B- rating from the NRA while Fox received an A.

    Our current Attorney General also received a B- rating.

    Most Democrats do not get good ratings from the NRA.
  2. Justin Robbins
    Report Abuse
    Justin Robbins - October 06, 2012 7:53 am
    What I saw is the comical results of a tactic of desperation. Its a pretty common story:

    The GOP, having no viable candidate of their own, obtained all...all...of Bucy's time cards and emails and poured over them, hoping to find some way to hurt her campaign.

    What they found, after scouring years of her records as a public servant, was an evening conference call, a lunch, and a campaign event on days she also claimed some sick time. One of their better minds realized that no reasonable person, or reputable media outlet, would find the hint of a problem. So they checked the GOP playbook, and farmed the whole thing to their UMB division (unprincipled, morally bankrupt) for dissemination on the blogs and comment sections of the Internet. Well done.
  3. BobT
    Report Abuse
    BobT - October 05, 2012 11:10 pm
    If you have proof, offer it up. Otherwise it is idle speculation and nothing more.

    As for Bucy's possible transgressions, did you actually follow the links and see there was actual research done? Her timecards were apparently obtained throughout a public records request and compared to her public events schedules, the evidence is there.
  4. Justin Robbins
    Report Abuse
    Justin Robbins - October 05, 2012 7:14 pm
    Bob, when your "research" consists of going to college with a guy, or linking to the Republican party website, you have a pretty small moral foxhole from which to lob the "do your research" grenade. However, it is refreshing that you recognize the impropriety in coordination between the Fox camp and the RSLC...I wonder if you have the strength of character to stand by that principle.

    If there was coordination, will you disavow Tim Fox?
  5. BobT
    Report Abuse
    BobT - October 05, 2012 4:07 pm
    Justin, if you yourself actually did some research, you'd know that the out-of-state media buy had nothing to do with the Fox campaign. Coordination between campaigns and outside groups like that is illegal. He has absolutely no control and no say over what is spent, if it's spent, and how. Check your facts before lobbing your own accusations.
  6. BobT
    Report Abuse
    BobT - October 05, 2012 4:05 pm
    Lobbying against our gun rights isn't the only thing Pam Bucy has been up to. Looks like she's been campaigning on state time, too:
  7. FlamingLiberal1
    Report Abuse
    FlamingLiberal1 - October 05, 2012 8:50 am
    I am pro-2nd amendment and own many firearms myself, but I disagree that people should have the right to shoot whomever they choose based on any perceived threat. Would George Zimmerman have gotten out of his truck to follow Trayvon Martin had he not been packing? I suspect not, and that innocent teenager would be alive today. Even more recently, a father fatally shot his own son when he mistook the boy for a robber. Gun rights need to be tempered with good sense. You can't un-shoot the gun once you've squeezed the trigger.
  8. Justin Robbins
    Report Abuse
    Justin Robbins - October 05, 2012 8:07 am
    Like most attacks from the right, this accusation would be devastating...if it were true. If you do the research Fox's college roommate skipped, you would find Bucy's only involvement was on behalf of the Montana Chief's of Police and the Montana Police Protective Association to ensure the bill did not allow people to point guns at police officers.

    It was Bucy's involvement that salvaged an otherwise ill-crafted and failing measure, and brought both parties together on a bill Governor Schweitzer was happy to sign.

    I agree with Mr. Tschida that we cannot have and AG beholden to special interests. I'm sure he was as shocked as I that Fox accepted over 700,000 pieces of out-of-state silver to fund his media; and shares my concerns of who now hold's Fox's reigns. Back on track indeed....

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Independent Record

Featured Businesses