Closer look needed

2010-07-11T00:00:00Z Closer look neededTheresa Frei, Letter to the editor Helena Independent Record
July 11, 2010 12:00 am  • 

Parts of the proposed health curriculum need a closer look. Concerning lessons on page 23 (draft), commonly called “child empowerment programs,” there are studies that show that these programs have been ineffective at reducing sexual abuse in children (grades K-3) and have actually caused increased anxiety, changes in sleeping patterns, and overanxious fear of strangers in children. (“To Protect and to Prevent,” Bissonette-Pitre, Ph.D., “With the Best Intentions: The Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Movement,” Berrick and Gilbert, and “Child Sexual Abuse: Prevention or Promotion,” Social Work 48, Rebecca Bolen.)

One study cites how these programs have been employed for 15 to 20 years, with no corresponding decline in child abuse (Bolen). These programs require powers that young children are not capable of, such as abstract concepts — this develops in later years. Children also think serially — “this” then “that.” They do not comprehend that a good person can do a bad thing. Over 70 percent of child sex abusers are someone close to the child.

As these programs increase anxiety and lack effectiveness, we are placing an undo burden on children by expecting them to protect themselves against predators that parents fail to identify. We need a curriculum that focuses on empowering parents, rather than expecting children to defend themselves.

Theresa Frei


Copyright 2016 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick