another view

Don’t be fooled by Charter’s initiative

2014-06-19T11:00:00Z Don’t be fooled by Charter’s initiative Helena Independent Record
June 19, 2014 11:00 am

Here’s the advertisement text: “Get the best value with TV + Internet + Phone.”

It even has a name — “The Triple Play.”

The company?

Charter Communications. 

Why should this matter?

Because it is the same Charter Communications that hopes to convince voters to support a ballot initiative, Initiative 172 (sponsored by a group called Big Sky Broadband for Lower Taxation) to lower its tax bill. It hopes to convince the public because it couldn’t persuade the Montana Supreme Court that it wasn’t a telecommunications services company, even though it offers in its own words — TV, Internet and phone.

The wonky, technical tax dispute centers on how to classify Charter, a newcomer to the Montana market after it bought Optimum. Montana taxes cable TV companies at a 3 percent rate, but telecommunications at 6 percent. 

In 2008, the state’s department of revenue concluded that Bresnan (the precursor to Optimum which then became Charter) didn’t reflect the company’s actual use of its properties. It reasoned because the company offered all three services, it was not just a cable TV company. The Montana State Supreme Court agreed and ordered Charter to pay at the 6 percent rate. For Charter, it meant an increase from $1.7 million in taxes to $7.3 million in one year, or a 329 percent rate hike.

The tax hike is indeed steep, but look at the logic of the ruling. The Department of Revenue found the company was classifying itself incorrectly and because of that, not paying its fair share of taxes. In many places, Charter has little competition and enjoys the benefits, but wasn’t paying its fair share according to the ruling of the revenue department and the state Supreme Court.

Now, Charter wants Montanans at the polls to become complicit in this ruse. It wants Montanans to believe that it’s not a telecommunications company when it offers phone, Internet and television service, bundled together. 

Groups are already starting to release a barrage of propaganda that ranges from sympathetic to threatening.

It would be easy to get sucked into the David-versus-Goliath plotline of a li’l ol’ business getting beaten up by the state’s taxmen. But the truth is: Charter gets the benefits of a fairly captive market in Montana. And, the state government is simply asking the telecommunications company to pay its fair share.

We sympathize with any person or business that would get slapped with a 329 percent tax increase. Yet, that increase isn’t due to some overly aggressive bureaucrat. It’s because Charter

didn’t use the correct tax classification. At its simplest analogy, it would be like not withholding enough on personal taxes. When that happens, you might end up owing the government.

That doesn’t feel good — and we get that. But not liking taxes does not mean that you should not have to pay. 

Charter’s sabers continue to rattle as the company warns it’s just trying to protect its customers from pass-along tax increases. 

But in that veiled threat, Charter has forgotten something very important: Its customers will still have a choice.

Undoubtedly, if Charter finds itself needing millions of extra dollars to pay taxes, it will not dig deeper into its own pockets. That means Charter will likely pass along the tax increase to its subscribers.

Yet customers then will have some recourse. Charter customers can choose whether to subscribe to broadband, phone or cable TV through the company. If the cost is too pricey, customers will still have control and can reject the pass-along tax increase by simply canceling service.

However, if the ballot measure is successful and Charter is able to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision, then that lost tax money, which is needed to fund classrooms and essential government services, will likely be passed along to every Montanan in the form of higher taxes, regardless of which residents subscribe to Charter. 

Charter seems to think it’s the only business that hates paying taxes, or that feels like taxes are too high.

The solution to that problem shouldn’t be to make everyone pay more.

This editorial first appeared in the Billings Gazette.

Copyright 2016 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. Sherlock
    Report Abuse
    Sherlock - June 20, 2014 2:07 am
    And you think Montana Department of Revenue (DOR) got your back in this...? What fools you are...

    DOR didn't want the public to know what they were up to so they settled with Charter out of court...!

    Why do you think both Ma Bell and Quest dumped our state...?
  2. skooter
    Report Abuse
    skooter - June 19, 2014 10:36 pm
    I think a very hidden part of this ridiculous tax dodge initiative is that Charter is still not offering some of the features it advertises here in state, and more important some features that subscribers outside of Montana (and maybe nearby former Optimum states) enjoy. You can not stream many major events from networks that have subscriber agreements with Charter - just not in this area. Try streaming an ESPN video cast and you'll get a request for a charter login that they don't offer us.

    It's farcical that they'd even think they should get to dodge their tax liabilities (funny I don't) but it's even ballsier when their service is spotty at best, they are short changing us features and advertising things they DO NOT provide us.

    Not a fan of Charter
  3. FlamingLiberal1
    Report Abuse
    FlamingLiberal1 - June 19, 2014 2:23 pm
    I had an obnoxious signature gatherer (I assume paid) attempt to bully me into signing this initiative after I declined. Not just no, but ABSOLUTELY not, sir!

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick