get it home page promo

State would do well to copy Colorado

2010-06-08T00:00:00Z State would do well to copy ColoradoBy Independent Record - An IR View Helena Independent Record
June 08, 2010 12:00 am  • 

What ever would Montana do without the power of hindsight channeled through Colorado? How to (or how not to) plan for growth; how to protect open space; how to combat beetle-killed trees.

Now, apparently, how to regulate medical marijuana.

All facetiousness aside, Montana has a good opportunity to learn a thing or two (read “swipe”) about reining in medicinal cannabis thanks to two bills signed into law Monday by Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter.

The bills, House Bill 1284 and Senate Bill 109, were two of the most prolific bills to pass through the state Legislature this year. In short, the legislation imposes complicated licensing requirements on medical-marijuana dispensaries and cracks down on unscrupulous doctors indiscriminantly handing out marijuana prescriptions.

Sound familiar? They’re two of the biggest unresolved problems with Montana’s medical marijuana law, passed in 2004 but which has blown up of late thanks, in part, to the Obama administration’s admission it won’t seek federal prosecution for states with medicinal cannabis laws.

As Montana’s legislators study possible fixes to our state’s medical marijuana law, they should look no further than Colorado, which passed its own initiative in 2000, but — until now — has experienced the same fast food-style marijuana-prescription operations that critics say have swelled Montana’s registry with illegitimate patients.

In the year after Montana’s initiative passed, 176 people were issued “green” cards, according to a study prepared for the Children, Families, Health, and Human Services Interim Committee in April. In June 2008, the number of cardholders reached 1,000. By December 2009, the number had jumped to 7,339.

The Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services has issued nearly 5,000 more cards in the past two months, with almost 15,000 now. About 2,800 people are registered to provide marijuana on behalf of one or more patients.

The Colorado laws require patients to have a “bona fide” relationship with the doctors who recommend marijuana for them, and will require doctors to have completed a full assessment of the patient’s medical history and be available for follow-up care. They also prevent doctors from getting paid by dispensaries to write prescriptions.

The laws also create strict new regulations for medical marijuana businesses, requiring dispensaries to be licensed both at the state and local levels and allowing local governments — or voters — to ban dispensaries and large-scale growing operations in their communities. Felony or drug-related felony offenders are also barred from operating a dispensary, as are people who have lived in Colorado for fewer than two years. All dispensaries are required to grow at least 70 percent of the marijuana they sell.

Finally, the laws make a distinction between dispensaries and “primary caregivers,” who can serve no more than five patients with six plants apiece. Primary caregivers are protected under Colorado’s constitution, but dispensaries are not.

While some medical marijuana proponents in Colorado say the laws go too far, others believe they don’t go far enough. Concession on both ends of the spectrum is what Montana needs. Whether Colorado’s laws will be litigated into stalemate is indefinite, but for now, it’s a good starting point for the discussion right here at home as we delicately balance respecting the will of the voters versus protecting public safety.

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick