Circ activation contest

Redistricting in hands of commission

2011-05-18T00:06:00Z Redistricting in hands of commissionIndependent Record Helena Independent Record
May 18, 2011 12:06 am  • 

We don’t envy the task ahead for the five-member Districting and Apportionment Commission charged with re-drawing the boundaries of the state’s legislative districts for the next decade. Carving up Montana into 100 slices and satisfying every political perspective in the process makes the job done by Solomon seem like a simple coin flip.

But since there’s no way to employ the playground-tested “I split, you choose” method for re-drawing the district lines, we have to trust the commission to best reflect the political demographics of the state as it goes about its business.

But what are those demographics? Is Montana red? Blue? It depends upon which elections you’re basing your color-coding, and the best answer may in fact be a shade of deep purple.

Consider: In presidential elections, Montana is one of the most reliably Republican states in the country. After backing Franklin Roosevelt four times and Harry Truman once, Montana has voted for a Democrat for president just twice since 1952 — for Lyndon Johnson in 1964, and for Bill Clinton in his first run, in 1992.

At the same time, Montana has been represented by at least one Democrat in the U.S. Senate for the past century, and for most of those 100 years, including today, both of Montana’s U.S. senators have been Democrats. Our lone seat in the U.S. House has been in Republican hands since 1997, a span of eight straight elections. Of the last 18 gubernatorial elections, Republicans have won 10, Democrats eight.

The Legislature, which is what the commission is most concerned with, has been more reliably, though certainly not exclusively, Republican since the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980. But taken as a whole, the evidence shows that Montanans refuse to be painted with a broad brush either red or blue.

Looking to the redistricting at hand, the latest census figures show that much of Montana’s population growth over the past decade took place in Republican-dominated legislative districts, particularly in the Bozeman area and the Flathead Valley. The most recent legislative elections would also suggest a red tide across the state, though we would caution that 2010 brought to bear a confluence of events that resulted in a GOP sweep of the U.S. House and major gains in the Senate, both typical for the next national election after a new president takes office and not necessarily indicative of a long-term trend.

In some states, there’s no more partisan task than drawing legislative districts, with the results being geographically laughable and representative of nothing save an attempt by the majority party to stay in power. We’ve seen incomprehensible districts earn nicknames like Arizona’s “Flying Giraffe” and Upstate New York’s “Abraham Lincoln Riding a Vacuum Cleaner.”

Montana took redistricting out of the hands of the Legislature with the passage of the new Constitution in 1972, and while it’s impossible to claim politics don’t play a major role in the process, we like the commission’s chances of hammering out something approximating a fair deal for everyone. Commission chair James Regnier is both a retired Montana Supreme Court justice and a professionally trained mediator — a background that we suspect will come in quite handy as the group attempts to accurately reflect our purple state in something more like a lovely lilac hue and less like an ugly bruise.

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick