Circ activation contest

Construction-less recovery not likely

2011-08-24T00:00:00Z Construction-less recovery not likelyBy Julie Altemus - IR Your Turn Helena Independent Record
August 24, 2011 12:00 am  • 

Recent news headlines have suggested that the state and national economy will likely recover from “The Great Recession” without the construction sector. This is simply not possible.

Unfortunately, the U.S. housing market continues to contract, with home sales declining and inventory offered each month increasing. A 2011 report by the University of Montana’s Bureau of Business and Economic Research indicates, “Estimates of real estate valuation and debt-to-equity, suggest that U.S. residential property owners lost another $1.7 trillion in value in 2010, for a total of $9 trillion since the 2006 peak.” One out of five homeowners is strapped with a mortgage that is more than their house is worth.

According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, total U.S. housing starts in 2006 recorded 1.8 million new construction units with roughly 25 percent of this construction in the West. As of July 2011 (just last month), total U.S. housing starts have dropped 34 percent to 604,000 new construction units and a respective 29 percent drop in the West. Closer to home, a report from the Montana Association of Home Builders indicates residential housing starts have declined 60 percent since 2007, a severe impact to our construction and lumber manufacturing industries.

Housing contributes to the gross domestic product in two fundamental ways: through private residential investment and consumptive spending on housing services. Residential investment includes construction of new single-family and multi-family units, residential remodeling, production of manufactured homes and fees associated with buying and selling of real estate investments. Consumption spending on housing services includes rent, utilities and an owner’s imputed rent of how much it would cost to rent owner-occupied units.

Historically, residential investment has averaged approximately 5 percent of the GDP while housing services have averaged between 12 and 13 percent, for a combined 17 to 18 percent contribution to the GDP. Residential and housing services contributed 18.5 percent to the GDP in 2005, then dropped to 15 percent by the fourth quarter of 2010 and slipped even further, to 14.9 percent by the end of the first quarter in 2011, a loss of roughly $36 billion dollars in just over five years.

Even though nationally paper products held their own until 2009, lumber products dropped from $30 billion in 2006 to $21 billion in 2009, according to a January 2011 report by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Even during the recession in the 1980s, combined residential fixed investment and housing services contributed 19 percent to the GDP. Gross domestic product growth in the beginning of 1980 was a negative 0.3 percent; GDP then rose to 4.1 percent in 1985 as the country worked its way out of a recession and fell again to 1.9 percent in 1990, causing worry of yet another recession. However, contributions to the GDP from construction and manufacturing stayed stable the entire decade. A robust construction and manufacturing industry has a direct impact on jobs and consumer confidence. One of the critical differences between the recession in the ’80s and the current “Great Recession” is the prolonged lag in the housing industry. Montana’s primary wood and paper products sector has lost roughly 4,000 jobs since 2004. The majority of these losses occurred between 2009 and 2010. At an average annual wage of $45,000, and using the standard 1.2-economic multiplier factor, the loss to Montana’s economy and our forest products industry is approximately $214 million.

Too many foreclosures and a tightening of the mortgage underwriting regulations have created quite a mess. It is far better to find ways to keep people in their homes through refinancing opportunities and federal assistance or incentive programs, than to add more foreclosures to the already 1.6 million homes that are now bank owned. It will take years to get through the glut in the foreclosure market. Adding more is not the answer. New housing starts create jobs, products and markets. The lesson of the past recessions is that new construction and lumber manufacturing serve to lessen the length and severity of a downturn in the economy and bolster consumer confidence.

As the newly appointed “super committee” tackles the monumental task of cutting $1.5 trillion from the federal deficit over the next 10 years, I hope it takes into consideration the vital contribution that housing, construction and lumber manufacturing provides. With all due respect, a construction-less economic recovery is not only unlikely — in my opinion, is simply not possible.

Julie Altemus is executive vice president of the Montana Wood Products Association.

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick