get it home page promo

Revisions a step in right direction

2010-09-29T00:00:00Z Revisions a step in right directionBy THERESA FREI, Your Turn Helena Independent Record
September 29, 2010 12:00 am  • 

At the Sept. 15 school board meeting, revisions made to the health enhancement curriculum draft were presented. While these revisions are a positive step in the direction of producing a draft that reflects the values of our Helena community, I believe that the district’s work isn’t finished.

True, some offensive language has been removed or clarified in parts of the curriculum, yet it still remains intact in other sections. For example, teaching the medically accurate names of the reproductive body parts to kindergartners was clarified. However, kindergarten teachers will still be expected to use these terms, rather than simply addressing them as “private parts.”  Also, fourth-graders are still required to identify the male and female reproductive systems using medically correct terminology. And third-graders will still discuss “that the ovary produces eggs and the testicles produce sperm.” (Revised 40) Doesn’t this all still require a detailed lesson on reproductive parts at a young age? Is this age-appropriate?

Further, “[u]nderstand that intercourse includes, but is not limited to …” was removed from the human sexuality section, but positions for intercourse still remain in the curriculum. They can be found in the “sexually transmitted infections” section.  Beginning in fifth grade, the curriculum states “[u]nderstand barrier methods of contraception (i.e. male and female condoms, dental dams can reduce but not prevent STIs)”. (Revised 57)  Isn’t knowledge of positions for intercourse a prerequisite for understanding how to properly employ barrier methods of contraception? Thus, discussing forms of intercourse in the fifth grade may have been removed from one section, but remains in the overall draft.

Other revisions to the draft sought to make the abstinence message more visible, which is commendable. However, the revised curriculum still fails to live up to our Montana Office of Public Instruction standards that state that a health curriculum should include the following:

“(a) support youth who have not had sexual intercourse to continue to postpone the initiation of sexual intercourse, (b) help youth who have had sexual intercourse to re-establish abstinence, and (c) present information on disease prevention methods for those unable or unwilling to refrain from sexual intercourse.” (Montana Accreditation Standards for Health Enhancement)

In the revised curriculum (b) remains entirely absent, and both (a) and (c) still need to be significantly strengthened. I would like to see some of the recommendations proposed at Tuesday’s meeting employed for this. For instance, it was noted that one doesn’t have to be abstinent their whole life, as the revisions imply (Revised 49), but that abstinence until marriage for both partners and faithfulness in marriage will protect 100 percent against STIs. I also support the suggestion that we should expand on the vague language of “[u]nderstand the risks associated with sexual activity” (Revised 49) to specifically include the physical, emotional and psychological risks of sexual activity. Also, how about adding instruction concerning the higher risk factors for STD infection associated with the young female body as suggested by Miriam Grossman? And, including a discussion, at an age-appropriate level, of how some forms of intercourse carry a higher rate of disease transmission than others? 

Further, this curriculum still needs to include the fact that sexually transmitted infections can be transmitted by more than just fluid to fluid contact (Revised 57), but also by skin to skin contact.

I thank the district for the revisions as they are certainly a step in the right direction, but there is still a lot of work to be done.

Theresa Frei is a Helena resident.

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(5) Comments

  1. 4HelenaKids
    Report Abuse
    4HelenaKids - October 08, 2010 12:04 am
    JSwede,
    I agree! That's probably why Helena thought they should hire an 'out of stater' to the board, 'assuming' he'd do a better job than a home grown college grad. But, it looks like dumbed down curriculums have infested our nation everywhere.
    Atleast a home grown superintendant would have cost the tax payers A LOT less!
  2. stonebuck
    Report Abuse
    stonebuck - October 05, 2010 1:56 pm
    When the basics are a national disater then everything else is just a symptom of that disease. This example is an example of how deep the intellectual refuse can get if the schools become the property of unions, associations and politicians.
  3. Curmudgeon
    Report Abuse
    Curmudgeon - October 04, 2010 10:54 am
    Ho-hum, PURPLE, yawn...your usual rant.

    Could you please provide some EVIDENCE that American school teachers are failing to teach that the U.S. won its independence from England? Not just some isolated instance from the hills of Kaintuck or wherever, but the nationwide, broad-brush condemnation that you would have us believe?

    Thank you.
  4. Purple
    Report Abuse
    Purple - September 29, 2010 11:41 am
    What does one expect from our education system with the liberals running it? Not only are they running it, they are running it into the ground!

    A good example is King obama while on the campaign trail when he proclaimed there were "57 states". When I was going to elementary school there were 49 states until Hawaii was added in the late 50s. I have no idea what King obama considers the other 7 states to be.

    Does anyone really believe our educators are really up to the task of teaching sex-ed when they don't even teach our children that the U.S. won it's independence from England?

    If teachers are INCAPABLE of teaching the basics, what does that say about them teaching sex-ed?

    This nation has seen an increase in the numbers of teachers having sexual relationships with their students. Is that what will be happening in the Helena school system in the very near future?
  5. JSwede
    Report Abuse
    JSwede - September 29, 2010 1:26 am
    Good grief people! In some ways I have to agree with those who have asked why aren't we fussing so much over academic standards? If all the energy and emotion used to nitpick this issue had been turned into anger that 20% of our kids don't graduate from high school, think of the impact. Our kids are graduating from a dumbed down curriculum and almost totally unprepared for real life - let alone higher education.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editor@helenair.com. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Independent Record

Great Helena Businesses