get it home page promo

Wolf-hunt plan draws comments galore

2012-07-09T00:00:00Z Wolf-hunt plan draws comments galoreBy EVE BYRON Independent Record Helena Independent Record
July 09, 2012 12:00 am  • 

More than 6,500 people weighed in on proposed changes to Montana’s 2012/2013 wolf hunting and trapping seasons, and chances are even more comments will be made during a July 12 Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission meeting.

Ron Aasheim, FWP spokesman, said they’re still going through what could be a record number of comments received by the state agency, with most of them focusing on the proposal to allow trapping of wolves as well as increasing the bag limit to three wolves per person per season.

“The comments came from in state, out of state and out of the country,” Aasheim said. “We got form letters, post cards, Survey Monkey (an online comment mechanism) emails and phone calls.

“I think what we are seeing is mainly a response to the suggestion that we trap wolves. We knew there would be lots of interest in it, so it wasn’t unexpected that there would be significant response and if 6,500 isn’t a record, it’s darn close to one.”

He noted that they’ll probably hear more from the public at Thursday’s FWP Commission meeting, since some

modifications have been made to the initial proposal. The commission is expected to make a final decision on the wolf hunting and trapping season at the meeting.

Comments at the meeting will be limited to changes that were initially proposed but are different in what’s now the final proposal before the commission.

The changes generally cover five areas, with the most controversial involving increasing the per person wolf bag limit. The initial proposal included seeking legislative approval in January to allow people to take more than one wolf. That meant the increased bag limit wouldn’t happen until after the 2013 legislature convenes.

However, after looking into the matter, Aasheim said FWP officials realized they have the power to increase the bag limit when it comes to trapping; the legislative approval is only needed to allow hunters to shoot more than one wolf.

So the new proposal advocates allowing up to three wolves per person, but only one can be harvested via hunting and the other two must be trapped. If that’s approved by the FWP Commission, it means people would be able to kill more than one wolf beginning this fall.

“This is part of our attempt to be a little more effective with our harvest,” Aasheim said. “It’s an attempt to hopefully take more wolves.”

Another proposal relaxes the 24-hour reporting requirement for people hunting in the backcountry. Aasheim said the change was made because, for example, some people on a 10-day hunting trip may shoot a wolf on the third day of the trip, but not have cell service to report the kill and instead would have to leave camp to travel long distances to notify FWP.

The new proposal would require the wolf harvest to be reported within 24 hours from arriving at a backcountry trailhead.

“We had people literally climbing mountains to try to report harvesting a wolf” last year, Aasheim said. “We want to make the reporting reasonable.”

FWP also is proposing that people who attend Idaho wolf trapping courses to be allowed to harvest them in Montana without having to take this state’s duplicative course. In addition, FWP wants to clarify that anyone who traps a nontargeted species, whether dead or alive, must report it.

Finally, FWP staff wants to allow the wolf hunting season to segue immediately from the archery to rifle season, similar to what’s done with bears. Originally, the wolf archery season was to end Oct. 14 and rifle season to start Oct. 20. They’re now proposing to allow the wolf rifle season to start Oct. 15.

“We don’t close the black bear season after archery, and we’re looking at doing something similar with wolves,” Aasheim said.

The FWP Commission meeting begins at 8:30 a.m. Thursday in Helena at the Montana Wild Education Center, 2668 Broadwater Ave., west of Helena near Spring Meadow Lake State Park.

Reporter Eve Byron: 447-4076 or


Copyright 2014 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. Reality22
    Report Abuse
    Reality22 - July 09, 2012 8:56 pm
    Let me see....... Montana's population has increase every year since the introduction including the two year they hunted them....Correct? And these people are still lipping off?? Is it not time? Do these people want another Minnesota....where the population has increased to a point where the access is trimmed every year....yup, they have to kill wolves every year in Minnesota because they continue to get into trouble despite what the wolf hugger say things are not honky dory in Minnesota. 2900 wolves and every year they have to kill 200 of the vermin or depredation gets out of hand....and how do they do it TRAPPING! ON THE GOVERNMENTS DIME! What is wrong with these people.....they complain about trapping yet continue to push for more wolves so that the only way of controlling them is TRAPPING and the taxpayer pays the bill! Can you imagine the amount a depredation if they had 2900 wolves in Montana with the landscape filled with livestock??

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Independent Record

Featured Businesses