get it home page promo
Horse sense

The GOP’s 11th Commandment and Ryan Zinke

2014-05-18T06:00:00Z The GOP’s 11th Commandment and Ryan ZinkeBy Charles Johnson Helena Independent Record
May 18, 2014 6:00 am  • 

It’s known as the Republican Party’s 11th Commandment: “Thou shalt not speak ill of fellow Republicans.”

Although popularized by President Ronald Reagan, its author was Gaylord Parkinson, a San Diego physician who chaired a divided California Republican Party in the mid-1960s. Reagan embraced it and emerged from a potentially divisive GOP primary race for governor in 1966 and won the general election.

Today, the 11th Commandment often is more honored in the breach than in the observance, at least nationally.

Look at Mitt Romney, who came away badly battered and bruised by his Republican opponents during the 2012 presidential primaries.

Now in Montana, three former state Republican chairmen, in a highly unusual move, have lined up to publicly oppose Republican U.S. House candidate Ryan Zinke in the five-way primary.

Former U.S. Rep. Rick Hill of Helena, former state Sen. Ken Miller of Laurel and state Sen. John Brenden of Scobey have accused Zinke of trying to rebrand himself as a staunch Republican conservative for the congressional race.

His refurbished image, they argue, is at odds with Zinke’s moderate voting record as a state senator from Whitefish in 2009 and 2011 on issues such as abortion, education, environment and labor.

Hill has used postings on his Facebook page to contrast Zinke’s campaign stands with his legislative voting record. Miller has done the same through his email list.

Hill supports state Sen. Elsie Arntzen of Billings in the primary. Miller said he could go for Arntzen, state Sen. Matt Rosendale of Glendive or former Sen. Corey Stapleton of Billings.

It’s hard to know how these critiques are affecting the primary. Zinke has been the leading fundraiser, by far, and was widely seen as one of the frontrunners.

Asked his reaction to the criticisms, Zinke said he continues to abide by the 11th Commandment.

“I think it’s unfortunate that people have forgotten Reagan,” he told me. “I think it’s reflective of a party in chaos; but I think with leadership, you can change the party and go for the party of no to the party of go.”

Longtime political observers, the state Republican chairman and even Hill and Miller can’t recall when a top Republican candidate here last underwent such a public critique.

“I’m not happy about it,” said state Republican Chairman Will Deschamps of Missoula. “There’s nothing I can do to stop it. People that make consistent drumbeats on someone in the party, they will be held accountable by somebody — but not the state party, not the state chair, not the executive director.”

Deschamps said he would rather see supporters of candidates talk about the good attributes their candidates than attack others.

Hill defended his actions.

“Ryan is running as a conservative,” Hill said. “If Montana Republicans decide to nominate a moderate, they are entitled to do that, but they shouldn’t think they are voting for a conservative. There is a pretty deep concern among mainstream Republicans that Ryan is just not in the mainstream of the Republican Party.”

Here’s Miller’s take: “It’s unprecedented that I’m aware of us. At the same time, it’s not just Ken Miller, John Brenden and Rick Hill. I’ve received many emails from voters thanking us. It really is what a primary is for — to vet a candidate. The goal is always to get the best candidate.”

Although Zinke cites the 11th Commandment, Miller said the Special Operations for America super PAC, which Zinke founded and critics say is still coordinates with, have run negative ads against Rosendale. Zinke has denied that he’s coordinated with the PAC.

What impact will all this have?

David Parker, political science professor at Montana State University, said the attacks levied against Zinke would be more unusual if they were coming from current party officers. Candidates’ use of surrogates to attack rivals is commonplace and protect the candidate who benefits, he said.

“Zinke is the candidate the other candidates are most worried about winning,” Parker said. “They believe that, in order to win, they have to knock him down a peg.”

If Zinke captures the primary, these internal attacks shouldn’t hurt him, Parker said.

“Recent research suggests that competitive and tough primaries do not hurt candidates in the general election,” Parker said. “Indeed, they help make the candidates better prepared for the rigors of the fall campaign. It would only drag Zinke down — and only if — the party refused to come together for the fall campaign. And that, I suspect, will not happen.”

Craig Wilson, political science professor at MSU Billings, said he thought Zinke was probably the primary favorite, prior to these attacks.

“But it remains to be seen to what extent they will be able to hurt him badly enough to sneak (their candidates) in,” Wilson said.

Chuck Johnson is chief of the Lee Newspapers State Bureau in Helena. He can be reached at 800-525-4920 or 406-447-4066. His email address is

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) Comments

  1. FlamingLiberal1
    Report Abuse
    FlamingLiberal1 - May 20, 2014 10:34 am
    I feel dishonest in doing so, but the GOP seems to have been hijacked by reactionaries. I think part of the qualification for being in government should be a belief in government.
  2. dietz1963
    Report Abuse
    dietz1963 - May 19, 2014 4:30 pm
    Right you are newsguy. I still remember the Clinton/Obama battle. Hard for me to believe they were in the same party. Then I thought it was hillarious for Clinton after getting her bashing by both Obama and democrats in her own party...turned around and took the Sec of State job. Now the speculation Clinton will get on the ticket again? Seriously?
  3. catspaw
    Report Abuse
    catspaw - May 19, 2014 3:52 pm

    This is the only way to get a win-win for the people in MT.

    I am with you on this one.
  4. FlamingLiberal1
    Report Abuse
    FlamingLiberal1 - May 19, 2014 10:19 am
    I am quite inclined to cross over and vote in the Republican primary to vote down these dark money backed TEA Party nuts.
  5. newsguy2014
    Report Abuse
    newsguy2014 - May 19, 2014 7:51 am
    Funny how this is "NEWS" but the fact that Montana Democrats are openly fighting amongst themselves over the Walsh/Bohlinger debacle not:

    This is exactly the reason people are fed up to the "Nth" degree with the 2 major party system. Because both parties feel if one is not either a Republican or a Democrat one is not worthy of running for office.

    How wrong they are...........................
  6. skooter
    Report Abuse
    skooter - May 18, 2014 1:29 pm
    Nothing to see here (but worth a little giggling if you are me): just another interesting act of Right on Right 'crime'. Maybe AFP can make hit ads for all of them against all of them...a true circular fire squad.

    5thgen...I know you have your fingers in your ears (or more like your eyes since you are NOT reading me anymore :(...this is a good example of the fraction between your guys and the tea-fringe that's going to make it hard for years to not have such a divided and less effective party electorally. Middle of the roads conservative can't be who they really and vote their agenda because if they don't pretend they are birthers or whatever is striking the tea bagger's iron that day, then they are attacked as practically being libs. Republicans sold their souls to the two things worse than the devil: the ultrarich and their very narrow agenda; and tea bag crazies. They gave you a midterm bump in 2010 but nothing but a stomach ulcer since with frozen/dysfunctional government, sleazy dark money politics and a divided party ever since.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick


Follow the Independent Record

Great Helena Businesses

Featured Offers & Deals