get it home page promo

Copper mine near White Sulphur Springs gets initial OK from DEQ

2013-07-16T00:00:00Z 2014-04-16T23:35:56Z Copper mine near White Sulphur Springs gets initial OK from DEQBy EVE BYRON Independent Record Helena Independent Record
July 16, 2013 12:00 am  • 

A possible copper mine at the headwaters of the famed Smith River has passed another hurdle.

On Monday, the state Department of Environmental Quality released a draft Environmental Assessment that says it’s determined that Tintina Alaska Exploration, Inc. will be able to mitigate any possible impacts from its ongoing exploration at the Black Butte Mine.

Potential impacts include the possibility about 20 to 30 percent of the rocks removed could generate acid runoff, sulfide materials in waste rock react with water and oxygen to produce sulfuric acid.

The Canadian-based company has been drilling core samples in a field northeast of White Sulphur Springs for about three years at a cost of about $18 million. Earlier this year, Tintina applied for a permit for a “decline,” which will let it get a better look at whether it’s economically feasible to mine for copper there.

Basically, the decline is a 5,200-foot-long ramp that goes underground. It will be 18-feet high and 18-feet wide on about 45 acres of private property off of Highway 89.

“They want to look at their potential ore body in three-dimensions,” said Warren McCullough, head of the DEQ permitting and compliance division. “They can pull out 10,000 tons for bulk sampling for metallurgical testing.”

DEQ Director Tracy Stone-Manning noted that this is only a preliminary decision, and that they’ll now put the proposal out for public comment.

“This exploration will provide DEQ and the public with hard data and information that can be used if and when we make a final decision on a permit for a mine,” Stone-Manning said.

Based on their core samples, Tintina forecasts that what it calls the “Johnny Lee deposit” could produce a single copper concentrate containing an average of 47 million pounds of payable copper metal per year during a 14-year mine life. That translates to 658 million pounds of copper, which at $3 per pound, would have a value of $1.97 billion.

In the 60-page draft document, Tintina proposes putting the underground materials it hauls out of the decline into two piles lined with a thick, nonpermeable barrier. The “PAG” pile is of Potential Acid Generating materials and is estimated to include about 30 percent of the rock. The remaining materials go into the “NAG” pile, which is the Non-Acid Generating rock.

Water that falls on the rocks will be collected and treated if necessary. The PAG pond would have the capacity to store 1.9 million gallons of water, while the NAG pond would have a 4.1 million gallon capacity.

If Tintina decides it’s not feasible to develop the copper mine, the company will put the PAG rocks back into the decline, cover it with a concrete barrier, then put the other rocks on top of that and reclaim the site. McCullough said that by burying the PAG, it no longer will create acid runoff.

The state already has a bond from Tintina for its sampling and will increase that — if the draft EA is finalized — so that if Tintina doesn’t reclaim the site adequately, the state can do it without incurring costs.

He added that they’re not sure what they’ll do with the PAG and NAG rocks if Tintina wants to further develop the mine.

“We’re taking this one step at a time,” McCullough said. “First they need to see what they’ve got there and probably do some economic studies and that type of thing. We don’t want to get too far ahead of ourselves.”

That, and the entire project, worries Jim Jensen, executive director of the Montana Environmental Information Center. He’s well aware of the long-term negative impacts of acid mine runoff from the Zortman/Landusky mine in northeast Montana and in Butte, where the 900-foot-deep Berkeley Pit, carved out from a copper mine, holds a 30 billion gallon stew of highly acidic water.

Jensen fears a large copper mine at the headwaters of the Smith River will have similar results and contaminate its pristine waters.

“Once again DEQ assures us there will be no harm to the water from a mine proposed in highly acidic rock,” Jensen said. “Their record does not give me confidence.”

He added that, in his opinion, the draft EA doesn’t include any solid data about safeguards for the water quality or quantity.

“This is short on details but long on assurances,” Jensen said.

McCullough, however, said the state is well aware of the concerns regarding Sheep Creek and Coon Creek, which run nearby and flow into the Smith River.

“That’s one reason it took longer than expected to put out this document,” McCullough said. “We took a close look at possible impacts on water quality and quantity.”

The draft EA will be posted on the DEQ web page:, and copies also can be obtained by writing to the DEQ Environmental Management Bureau, c/o Herb Rolfes, P.O. Box 200901, Helena, MT 59620; calling Rolfe at 444-3841; or sending him an email addressed to

Public comments concerning the adequacy and accuracy of the Draft EA will be accepted until Aug. 26. A public meeting also will be held before the end of the comment period.

Reporter Eve Byron: 447-4076 or Follow Eve on Twitter @IR_EveByron

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. RedHawk
    Report Abuse
    RedHawk - July 31, 2013 12:10 am
    Moderator: I tried to comment here but I guess there is no room for truth any more these days .I have bought 5 different properties in Meagher County Montana trying to find a little of the wild . Each one has had its own misery attached to it. First it was the slaughter of the wild Buffalo at Yellowstone so the ranchers could have more grass. Then I tried again at Grassy Mt Ranch. The infighting of the many neighbors made life unbearable there. Now I have 3 lots close to this copper mine off of Highway 89. This will be a living nightmare once this land is ripped apart for profits. I tried to explain my views here but it wasn't posted. Did I say something that was true that hurt your little ears? I will not comment here again .
  2. RedHawk
    Report Abuse
    RedHawk - July 30, 2013 9:05 pm
    It seems Montana just doesn't learn from its mistakes. Mines from the past have turned out to be a disaster for Montana but here we go again . Meagher County is a very beautiful County so now I guess its time to turn it into another mining disaster. .Why? Money. I would suggest all the Locals get out and take all the pictures they can of how beautiful Meager County is now so they can show their grandchildren how it used to be. Get out and enjoy the Smith while you can before its contaminated .My question here is there any place on this planet where the wild country is safe from this destruction?
  3. steeline
    Report Abuse
    steeline - July 16, 2013 11:30 am
    Check out the history of Silverbow Creek at Butte if you are interested in seeing what mine acids do. It takes millions to clean it up and that is iffy.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick


Follow the Independent Record

Great Helena Businesses


Featured Offers & Deals