Circ activation contest

Sporting groups want Milk River Ranch comment period extended

2012-12-05T00:05:00Z 2013-05-19T13:49:25Z Sporting groups want Milk River Ranch comment period extendedBy EVE BYRON Independent Record Helena Independent Record
December 05, 2012 12:05 am  • 

Two prominent sporting groups are asking the current FWP Commission to extend the public comment period for the Milk River Ranch acquisition until at least 2013, after learning that federal funding for the purchase fell through.

The Montana Sportsmen Alliance, which represents hunters and anglers, sent an email Tuesday to Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commissioners, saying they want the comment period to run until Feb. 1, 2013, for a variety of reasons. In the event the FWP Commission chooses not to extend the comment period, the Sportsmen Alliance says it opposes the proposed $4.7 million purchase of 2,992 acres from brothers David and Verges Aageson. The property is about 45 miles north of Havre along the Canadian border and would be used as a wildlife management area.

“Montana Sportsmen Alliance strongly supports the acquisition of lands by FWP that provide additional access and recreational opportunities for the general public,” the group said in the email that Vito Quatraro sent to the FWP Commission. “Our concern is not with additional lands but instead that we are using public dollars to purchase the best properties available.”

John Gibson, president of the Public Land/Water Access Association, said his group initially came out in support of the purchase. However, like the Sportsmen Alliance, Gibson’s group became concerned once they learned that Pittman-Robertson funds — raised by the sale of ammunition and guns nationwide — no longer will be used to purchase the ranch.

Instead, when FWP officials learned in October that artifacts on the property might make the federal funding unavailable for months or even years, the decision was made to use Habitat Montana money, which comes from the sale of hunting licenses in Montana.

FWP officials said not only would it temporarily drain the Habitat Montana coffers — at least until next July — the Milk River Ranch purchase also would put three other land projects “on hold.”

“There was some confusion on the funding and we want to look at it again,” Gibson said. “In light of the fact that Pittman-Robertson money couldn’t be used for the purchase of the Milk River Ranch, that changed some priorities down the line.

“That isn’t to say we will not support it; we’re just asking the commission to delay their decision so we can evaluate it on the basis of new information.”

Not an unusual request

Bob Ream, the FWP Commission chairman, didn’t return a telephone call Tuesday seeking comment on the extension request. But Commissioner Ron Moody, whose district includes the Milk River Ranch, said they’ve regularly granted public comment period extensions.

“In my four years on the commission, delaying purchase processes for various reasons like appraisals and other details of the transaction has always been routine,” Moody said. “So I would presume that the commission would have to look seriously at the request.”

The Sportsmen Alliance, as well as Stan Meyer, an FWP commissioner from 1993-2001, had similar funding concerns but also raised other issues. They questioned the appraised value of the property, noting that comparable sales don’t appear to justify the proposed purchase price. FWP officials had expected it to fetch an appraisal of about $2.8 million; instead it came back at $4.7 million.

Meyer and the Sportsmen Alliance note that the Milk River Ranch acquisition ranks last out of 15 proposed land projects this year, which “has raised numerous questions as to the motives behind this proposed purchase.”

The Sportsmen say the proposal has been “fast-tracked” to close in 2012, without the proper vetting and that it lacks transparency.

“There seems to be legitimate questions as to the hunting, fishing and recreational value of this property with the obvious questions being ‘is the public getting the best bang for their bucks,’” the Sportsmen Alliance said in the email.

Meyer was even more blunt, calling it a “rush-rush deal.” He noted that the State Land Board voted on the proposal before FWP — which is opposite of the typical process — and that the FWP Commission set up a special conference call for Dec. 10 to vote on the matter instead of waiting for its regular Dec. 20 meeting in Helena.

He added that few, if any, Hill County residents have voiced support for the sale — mainly based on what they believe is an inflated price tag — and that sportsmen he’s talked to about the project are more interested in other purchases and conservation easements that are on hold.

One of those projects is the Teigen Ranch near Winnett, which is up for sale. Owner Dan Teigen has expressed interest in putting a conservation easement on 22,000 acres to allow hunting access.

“The sportsmen I have talked with are very interested in getting an easement on the Teigen property,” Meyer said. “It’s good for upland game birds, antelope and now it’s put on indefinite hold because those dollars are going toward the Milk River Ranch.”

FWP officials as well as some sporting groups have praised the ranch for its wildlife habitat and travel corridors, noting that it’s an important route between the United States and Canada. About seven miles of the Milk River runs through the lowlands parcel slated for purchase by FWP.

Owners’ tax concerns

FWP officials have said that they’re moving quickly on the ranch purchase because the Aagesons are concerned about increased tax rates. They note that all of the land projects listed each year are good projects, and that it’s not unusual for lower-ranked projects to jump ahead of others in the process. Sometimes those projects are easier than higher-ranked ones, sometimes there’s a pressing need and sometimes other factors come into play.

The Department of Natural Resources and Conservation already has been given authority by the Land Board to purchase another 1,513 acres of the ranch for about $1 million. That cropland will be leased back to the Aagesons.

In addition, the area’s use by Native Americans stretches back centuries, and it also was home to dinosaurs. The Montana Board of Regents last month agreed to pay $2 million for the rights to archaeological and paleontological artifacts on the Milk River Ranch, bringing the total purchase price to $7.7 million in public funds.

A second appraisal done in September, which focused on the artifacts, put their value at $12.7 million; the Aagesons will donate back to the university the $10.7 million difference between the $2 million the Regents offered to pay.

The total $7.7 million sale price equates to $1,709 per acre for the Milk River Ranch. If the values in the two appraisals totaling $17.4 million are taken into consideration, the per-acre price increases to $4,102.

In comparison, last week the 124,000-acre Broken O Ranch, which spans three counties along the Rocky Mountain Front and includes 20 miles of the Sun River near Augusta, was sold to a private party. The price was not disclosed, but it was listed for $135.5 million — or $1,092 per acre.

Reporter Eve Byron: 447-4076, eve.byron@helenair.com or Twitter.com/IR_EveByron

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(5) Comments

  1. AngelaBWright
    Report Abuse
    AngelaBWright - October 25, 2014 12:07 pm
    Thanks for the information Eve. You are great to provide this information. I see many people from all around the world have the articles for real estate that help the people to know about it but you are great in your analysis and data gathering. It is same like pay for essays australia that helps the students in their educational issues and solve their problems.
  2. Victorian lady
    Report Abuse
    Victorian lady - December 06, 2012 8:07 am
    When the Governor denied knoiwing the Aagesons, I knew this was politics at its best. No wonder people mistrust their elected officials. I personally know both parties and am so dissapointed to say the least.
  3. otis mule
    Report Abuse
    otis mule - December 05, 2012 11:43 pm
    As the story grows, not a peep from the Guv. He's probably hoping the whole thing quietly goes away before D.C. hears about it and ruins his chance for a cushy cabinet appointment. Imagine the large scale mischief he could cause with an outfit that can print the money it needs instead of dealing with a bothersome budget.
  4. steeline
    Report Abuse
    steeline - December 05, 2012 3:52 pm
    I think if they wait until they get their ducks in a row the ranch will still be available. Who in their right mind would pay 7.7 million for a 2.8 million ranch. Guess.
  5. billthetaxpayer
    Report Abuse
    billthetaxpayer - December 05, 2012 1:18 pm
    Eve
    Once again a great job on a well written and well researched article. Keep after this as you seem to be the lone voice on the real story at hand

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editor@helenair.com. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Activate subscription button gif
Subscribe to HelenaIR.com Email Newsletters

Breaking news, contests, morning headlines and more. Sign up for updates from the Independent Record

Follow the Independent Record

Deals, Offers and Events

Let us replace your windshield! Call Clear Choice Auto Glass at 406-495-8000

Clear Choice Auto Glass offers FREE estimates!

Need your vent and sliding glass repaired? Call Clear Choice Auto Glass at 406-495-8000

Clear Choice Auto Glass offers FREE estimates!

Great Helena Businesses

Clipped From The Newspaper