Circ activation contest

Judge orders Grizzly Gulch gold miner to compensate neighbors in dispute

2013-04-24T00:26:00Z 2013-04-24T01:09:16Z Judge orders Grizzly Gulch gold miner to compensate neighbors in disputeBy EVE BYRON Independent Record Helena Independent Record
April 24, 2013 12:26 am  • 

The man who owns a small gold mine excavation operation up Grizzly Gulch south of Helena has agreed to pay his neighbors $44,400, plus interest, for working too close to their property.

Pretty Girl mine owner Al Ballard and his neighbors, Russell and Melissa Levens, have been feuding for about a decade over his activities, with the argument ending up before the Montana Supreme Court in 2011. Part of the dispute involved whether Ballard was “excavating” in a 30-foot buffer zone next to his property, or whether the sloughing off of land in the buffer zone, which was falling into his open pit mine, was “excavation” instead.

A 2005 agreement, as well as a 2006 legal decision, had prohibited excavating in the buffer zone. In 2011, Lewis and Clark District Court Judge Kathy Seeley ordered Ballard to “immediately” restore the buffer zone by filling in the excavation with appropriate fill material and restoring a level ground surface in the zone.

That apparently didn’t happen, and as part of a judgment filed this month, Seeley said Ballard had to restore the 30-foot buffer zone by June 1. Once again, she said the restoration work should be compacted yet level with the ground surface and must be supported by a sloping surface, no steeper than 45 degrees, to prevent further sloughing.

Seeley also put in a deadline — again — for the work to get completed. This time she ordered that for every day beyond June 1 that the restoration is not completed, Ballard shall pay a penalty of $100 to the Levenses.

In the newest judgment, Seeley also elaborated on the dollar figures involved in the case. She said Ballard and his companies, Ecosafe Gold Recovery LLC and Placer Mine Development LLC, are responsible for the Levens’ costs and attorney’s fees, totaling $14,391, plus 10 percent interest that has accrued since Nov. 23, 2011.

She also ordered Ballard to pay the Levenses $10,035, with 10 percent interest, for the attorney’s fees arising from the Supreme Court appeal. In addition, Seeley hit Ballard with a $20,000 fine, with 10 percent interest, for failing to restore the 30-foot buffer zone as previously ordered, for a total of $44,426.

The Levenses agreed to waive the right to execute Seeley’s judgment for one year to give Ballard time to come up with the money. However, Seeley noted that any sale of a portion or all of Ballard’s property shall include the requirement to pay the judgment in full.

Both Ballard and Russell Levens declined to comment publicly on the judgment.

The dispute between Ballard and the Levens family over the Pretty Girl mine less than half a mile south of the Helena city limits goes back to 2003, when Lewis and Clark County allowed Ballard to relocate the county road that had formerly separated the mine and the Levens’ properties.

They entered into a written agreement in 2005 defining their boundary, according to a draft survey, which gave Ballard title to the 30-foot strip between the two properties. In return, he agreed that to protect the lateral support of the Levens’ property, he wouldn’t excavate with 30 feet of their land.

They also agreed to share the cost of a new survey, but disputes arose after Ballard occupied the area between the two properties and refused to sign the new certificate of survey, according to court documents.

The Levenses filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction, and former District Court Judge Thomas Honzel in 2006 permanently prohibited Ballard from excavating within 30 feet of the Levens’ property.

In June 2009, the Levenses filed a motion for contempt against Ballard for failing to abide by Honzel’s judgment, saying there was sloughing and cracking within the 30-foot zone. Since Honzel had retired, Seeley took the case and denied their request, finding that while there was “slumping of material” along the edge of Ballard’s pit, he hadn’t actually excavated within 30 feet of the property line. She ordered the Leveneses to pay Ballard’s attorney fees.

The Supreme Court reversed that decision in June 2011 and remanded it to Seeley for reconsideration, and she found that Ballard had, in fact, violated Honzel’s ruling.

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. steeline
    Report Abuse
    steeline - April 25, 2013 3:25 pm
    It is good that the "tin can and pencil" miners get a message that they just can't go out a rip up the land for a couple of nuggets. The value of our mountains and creeks in their natural state is far more valuable in a long run than a bit of gold to make a necklass for some doper in California.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick