FWP recommends expanded wolf season and bag limit

2013-05-01T16:56:00Z 2013-05-02T00:13:01Z FWP recommends expanded wolf season and bag limitBy EVE BYRON Independent Record Helena Independent Record
May 01, 2013 4:56 pm  • 

Montana’s wolf rifle hunting season could last six and a half months, and up to five wolves could be taken by a hunter or trapper under a proposal to come before the state Fish, Wildlife and Commission next week.

The commission will consider whether to lengthen the amount of time wolves could be hunted with rifles from Sept. 15 to March 31. Last year, the wolf hunting season started Oct. 15, with the regular big game rifle season, and ended Feb. 15. Hunters harvested 128 wolves during the 2012/2013 season and trappers took 97 for a total of 225.

This year, however, the start of the rifle hunting season would coincide with the black bear and backcountry big-game rifle seasons. The trapping season, which ran from Dec. 15 through Feb. 28 in 2012 and 2013, would remain the same this season under the proposal.

George Pauley, FWP Wildlife Management Chief, said the reasons for the proposed changes are twofold.

“We’re just looking for opportunities to hunt wolves … and it’s an attempt to reduce the population,” Pauley said. “We’ve always had a philosophy of incrementally increasing harvest rates and opportunities.”

A person who is both hunting and trapping wouldn’t be allowed to take any more than five wolves.

In documents supporting the proposed changes, FWP notes that while Montana doesn’t have an overall population objective for wolves, “it is clear that a more aggressive wolf hunting season will not harm wolf populations or genetic diversity.”

FWP also notes that it is apparent that additional harvest will be required to reduce wolf abundance.

“Added harvest should provide additional relief to livestock producers and in some instances, relief to big game populations that are performing poorly, due in part, to the effects of wolf predation,” FWP officials stated, adding that other seasons for elk, deer, bear and lion are managed in similar fashions.

Recovery of gray wolf populations has been ongoing since the late 1980s after they were extirpated from their traditional ranges by trapping, poisoning and shooting them as nuisances and predators. In Montana, they were removed, then returned numerous times to the list of animals protected under the federal Endangered Species Act until, in April 2011, an act of congress delisted them.

At the end of 2012, the known minimum wolf population in Montana was 625 wolves in 147 packs. The statewide population has trended upward since recovery efforts began and FWP believes it’s stabilizing, with the minimum count dropping this year from a high of 653 known wolves in 2011.

“The rate of wolf population growth in Montana appears to be slowing down as the highest quality habitats with the lower potential for conflicts are occupied,” FWP stated in documents.

Pauley said that House Bill 73, which was passed early in the legislative session, allows the commission to decide how many wolves a hunter or trapper can harvest. The bill also allows the use of electronic calling devices, removes a requirement to wear hunter orange outside the general deer and elk season and prohibits FWP from banning wolf hunts in areas around national parks.

Under the proposal, the wolf archery season will open on Sept 7 and run through Sept 14.

Another proposed change includes allowing hunters to take wolves over bait placed to trap wolves during the trapping season.

“The change is proposed to allow trappers to harvest wolves spotted on their trap line, without the concern regarding the presence of bait at some sets,” FWP notes in documents.

The requirement to immediately kill trapped wolves also would be modified under the proposal, as part of a possibility that trappers would work with FWP to capture and collar wolves.

FWP will continue to maintain the general season without a statewide quota under the proposal. However, a seven-wolf quota would be set in an expanded Wolf Management Unit 316, just north of Yellowstone National Park, and the quota would remain at two wolves in WMU 110 abutting Glacier National Park.

The state agency also is asking the commission to allow FWP to initiate emergency season closures at any time, especially if harvest levels seem excessive.

“Any such closure would necessarily include an appropriate timeline and public notice, and that may include press releases and posted signs,” according to FWP.

Like last year, anyone trapping will have to take a course put on by FWP. During 2012, 2,414 trappers completed the Montana Wolf Trapper Education Course.

The FWP Commission meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. Thursday, May 9, at the Montana Wild Center, 2668 Broadwater Ave., next to Spring Meadow Lake State Park off Highway 12 West in Helena. How-ever, discussion on the wolf season proposals is the last agenda item, so that probably will be part of the afternoon session.

Eve Byron: 447-4076 or eve.byron@helenair.com. Follow Eve on Twitter @IR_EveByron.

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(5) Comments

  1. Tguide
    Report Abuse
    Tguide - May 14, 2013 11:53 am
    For some reason my last post was not posted! So...here I go again. Wolves are wildlife...they need, and will be managed like all the other wildlife species. With that in mind....people here need to understand we need to harvest (hunt, kill, whatever you want to call it) to keep them in balance with their prey speices or they will eat themselves out of house and home. Wolves are not dependent on forest, plains, canyons, riparian zones, etc......they are truely totally "prey dependent" they will go (follow) the prey base where ever they go. To have a sustainable wolf population...we need a sustainable prey population (mainly elk). Wolves need harvested just like certain prey populations need to be. Hunting is a valuable tool that is needed and necessary for both. And where necessary, wolves need shot when they are damaging private property (livestock, dogs etc.). These are just the facts, and not emotional based comments.
  2. skippa
    Report Abuse
    skippa - May 02, 2013 6:32 pm
    Montana's Wolf hunts are not based on current, fact based science. They are politically motivated blood fests that satisfy the interests of the hunting and livestock industries. Wolves kill few livestock - over 2,500,000 Cows in Montana last year and Wolves killed 77 - less than 1/10 of 1%. Wolves do not pose a serious threat to humans - 1 person killed in the US in the last 115 years by healthy, wild Wolves- Cows killed 10 people last year in Montana. Wolves also benefit the environment - Elk numbers have gone from 89,000 in 1995 to over 149,000 last year in the NRM - source RMEF. So, why does Montana continue to liberalize the rules for killing and increase the number of Wolves killed every year? No common sense and no scientific input just kill, kill, kill what you don't like or understand. The same as it has always been.
  3. GreatWhite
    Report Abuse
    GreatWhite - May 02, 2013 2:38 pm
    I agree with you David...as the "Fish, Wildlife blah blah blah" it is their DUTY and RESPONSIBILITY to look beyond the econonic value of all of our wildlife. But they say it themselves:

    “We’re just looking for opportunities to hunt wolves … and it’s an attempt to reduce the population,” Pauley said. “We’ve always had a philosophy of incrementally increasing harvest rates and opportunities.”

    Science and facts aside...they are just looking for opportunities to destroy wildlife.
  4. steeline
    Report Abuse
    steeline - May 01, 2013 8:50 pm
    It is too bad that when "they" decided to put the wolf back on the Montana landscape that those who were in favor of the idea didn't understand what they were doing. The wolf has poven to be a preditor to contende with. They have had a huge impact on game animals especially the moose populations. Big game animals reproduce by having one or two offspring and a wolf can have up to three times that many. Wolves kill and eat big game animals year around. Next month they will feast on new born elk, deer, mountain sheep, moose and other critters. It would be wise to have open season year around do to the nature of the wolf and the area they cover. With modern equipment to track wolves FWP can monitor known packs well enough to keep the wolf from extinction in the lower 48. So if you are a wolf advocate don't worry be happy with what you have. Lets work on balance in the wilds.
  5. DavidShellenberger
    Report Abuse
    DavidShellenberger - May 01, 2013 8:26 pm
    The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission should become familiar with the ecological, spiritual, and economic value of wolves. It should also consider the inhumanity of hunting and trapping them. Wolves should be embraced and protected, not killed.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editor@helenair.com. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick