get it home page promo

FWP: Good-sized fish plentiful on Missouri

2013-11-27T06:00:00Z FWP: Good-sized fish plentiful on MissouriBy EVE BYRON Independent Record Helena Independent Record
November 27, 2013 6:00 am  • 

Chances are, if you had a “trout on” while fishing on the Missouri River between Helena and Great Falls recently, it was a nice sized one.

Fish surveys by Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks this year revealed that rainbow and brown trout numbers remain above the long-term average in the Missouri River between Holter Dam and the town of Cascade, according to Grant Grisak, a state fisheries biologist. And while the numbers haven’t been crunched upstream, FWP biologist Eric Roberts said they were finding a lot of fish and that they’re pretty good size.

“This year we did (the fish survey) below Hauser Dam, and while the number of fish may have dropped a little bit, the size of the fish was noticeably larger for both rainbow and brown trout,” Roberts said. “The average size of fish was in the four-pound range, and that’s about the middle; so we handled quite a bit of fish that were bigger than that.”

Roberts noted that he alternates each year between surveys below Hauser and Holter dams.

Downstream near the town of Craig, state fisheries crews estimated the Missouri River held 5,194 rainbow trout that were greater than 10 inches long per mile. That’s not quite as many as in previous years —6,034 per mile in 2011 and 7,312 in 2012 — but it surpasses the long-term average of 3,174 rainbows per mile.

Grisak, who works that section of the Missouri above Craig and through Cascade, said he also was seeing fish larger than in previous years even though there were slightly fewer of them overall. He added that’s typical when the population reaches its maximum size.

“This year, 87 percent of the rainbow trout in the Craig section were 15 inches long or greater, and 35 percent of the population was 18 inches long or longer,” Grisak said in a press release.

Farther downstream near Cascade, the estimated number of rainbow trout that were 10 inches long and greater was 2,260 per mile, above the long-term average of 1,551 per mile.

Grisak anticipates that the population should return to normal levels next year, unless an unusually large flush of water comes through the spawning tributaries. High water in the Missouri River tributaries typically equates to high rainbow trout production, according to Grisak.

Brown trout in the Craig section that were 10 inches long and greater were estimated at 745 per mile. The long-term average is 578. Brown trout in the Cascade section that were 10 inches long and greater were estimated at 447 per mile, with the long-term average there at 387.

Brown trout populations are sampled in the spring and rainbow populations are sampled in the fall.

Aren Lindquist, who works in The Trout Shop in Craig, said there’s definitely a lot more trout in the river, which also translates to more people fishing there.

“It doesn’t matter if it’s rainbows or browns. But since the majority out there are rainbows, that’s what they catch; brown trout are a little more tricky,” Lindquist said. “People come out because of the characteristics of the Missouri. Its tail waters are pretty consistent water temperature and the fish have an abundant food source.”

Roberts said the popularity of the Missouri River fishery obviously hasn’t negatively impacted the trout population, with many anglers practicing catch and release techniques.

But that same popularity has led to some grumbling among the various fishing factions.

“From a social perspective, there is some friction there,” Roberts said. “You have more folks in jet boats, then you have the boaters and the waders, and each one wants to blame the other for perceived changes to the fishery. The waders say the boaters are dragging their anchors through the spawning redds (nests) and the boaters say the waders are going through the redds.

“But from a biological perspective, things are cooking along pretty good out there.”

Reporter Eve Byron: 447-4076 or eve.byron@ Follow Eve on Twitter @IR_EveByron

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. caribouboy
    Report Abuse
    caribouboy - November 29, 2013 7:12 am
    This is an extremely disjointed article. It's a shame we don't have someone that knows something about the Missouri and fishing writing for the IR.

    They talk about the survey below Hauser and then give no info except for size of fish as opposed to the count estimates. Then she talks about Roberts alternating between Hauser and Holter. So no historical data about the Hauser stretch and we're left to believe that below Holter is only done every other year which is definitely not the case.

    Follow that up by intimating that people are dragging anchors and jet boating the whole stretch of river while that only happens in the Hauser stretch and you have a pretty confusing article.

    And finally, how about a link to the actual data? Would it hurt to give the people who are interested in reading an article such as this a path to additional information?

    We haven't had an outdoor writer for a long time. We could use one.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Independent Record

Great Helena Businesses