A study of federal-land management problems in Montana roiled a legislative panel Wednesday, as some members said the report has a “hidden agenda” of transferring ownership of federal lands to the state.

“This state is not for sale,” said Rep. Bill McChesney, D-Miles City. “This state cannot afford to assume ownership of federal lands. … I think there are hidden agendas here. I’m just going to say it.”

McChesney and other Democratic members of the Environmental Quality Council said they wouldn’t support releasing the draft report, which they said is biased in favor of Republican views of public-land management.

Sen. Jennifer Fielder, R-Thompson Falls, the sponsor of the bill that led to the report, noted it does not recommend transferring federal lands to state ownership or management.

“None of the recommended legislation would transfer (land), either,” she added. “We’re recommending to work cooperatively with the (federal) agencies to try to solve this problem.”

However, Fielder agreed to have the report re-edited and brought back to the council today, for a possible vote that would ask for public comment on the report.

Ultimately, the report is supposed to recommend what the 2015 Legislature should do to address problems with federal land management in Montana.

Supporters of the report Wednesday said it’s meant as a “first step” toward more collaboration with federal land managers, to enable quicker decisions on activities such as logging, mining permits and road construction that will help local economies and improve forest health.

The draft report identified more than two dozen “risks and concerns,” most of which identified federal management as inadequate, cumbersome and adverse to local needs and economies.

Its five recommendations called for “reducing wildfire fuels” through logging, increasing access for “multiple use,” increasing “economic production” on federal lands, strengthening local involvement in management of the lands and ensuring that laws favorable to state and local priorities are followed.

Yet Democratic members of the panel and others said the report and the discussion seems to be pointing toward support of transferring federal lands to state management.

They noted that the state Republican Party last month supported a platform plank calling for such a transfer, and that Fielder organized the appearance before the Council of a Utah legislator and others promoting the transfer.

“To see (the transfer) become part of the Republican Party platform really has raised the governor’s level of concern with where this is going,” said Tim Baker, natural resources policy adviser for Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. “I just want to be really clear: The governor does not in any way support the transfer of (federal) public lands to the state.”

Harold Blattie, executive director of the Montana Association of Counties, said the group hasn’t taken a position on the idea, but has many questions about the financial aspect of transferring federal lands to the state.

“A major piece that is missing from the whole study is a financial analysis: What are the costs? What are the rewards?” he said. “I think that would be a very arduous undertaking in and of itself.”

Fielder said after the meeting the idea behind the report is to scrutinize how federal lands are being managed and identify what could be done differently to improve it.

Transferring management of the land to the state is just one option, she said, but one everyone seems to want to talk about it.

Reporter for the Montana Lee Newspapers State Bureau Helena, Montana.

(4) comments


Look for and propose solutions to the problems with Federal land management. Transferring land to the State will also transfer the problems and create a financial crisis along with it - thus adding to the problems. The Republican Party has many intelligent people but apparently they all suffer from an acute cranial-rectal inversion.


i'd like to see your point of view but i can't bend that way


What most folks don't know is that BLM is actively looking to dump (sell off properties) they don't want to be bothered with...!

And, both the USFS and BLM are closing roads to these properties as part of the process in getting rid of land they don't want to manage...

The road closures are part of the plan that have resulted in States wanting to take back our Public Lands before the Fed's sell them off...

Look at Nevada, BLM selling of land to China... What gives...?


Wow. That is one of the most ridiculous, misguided comments I've seen in awhile. I wish I could just spout out stuff with no facts backing it up and believe it as truth. Nice work.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.