get it home page promo

Democrats decry ‘hidden agenda’ in federal-land report

2014-07-10T06:00:00Z Democrats decry ‘hidden agenda’ in federal-land report Helena Independent Record

A study of federal-land management problems in Montana roiled a legislative panel Wednesday, as some members said the report has a “hidden agenda” of transferring ownership of federal lands to the state.

“This state is not for sale,” said Rep. Bill McChesney, D-Miles City. “This state cannot afford to assume ownership of federal lands. … I think there are hidden agendas here. I’m just going to say it.”

McChesney and other Democratic members of the Environmental Quality Council said they wouldn’t support releasing the draft report, which they said is biased in favor of Republican views of public-land management.

Sen. Jennifer Fielder, R-Thompson Falls, the sponsor of the bill that led to the report, noted it does not recommend transferring federal lands to state ownership or management.

“None of the recommended legislation would transfer (land), either,” she added. “We’re recommending to work cooperatively with the (federal) agencies to try to solve this problem.”

However, Fielder agreed to have the report re-edited and brought back to the council today, for a possible vote that would ask for public comment on the report.

Ultimately, the report is supposed to recommend what the 2015 Legislature should do to address problems with federal land management in Montana.

Supporters of the report Wednesday said it’s meant as a “first step” toward more collaboration with federal land managers, to enable quicker decisions on activities such as logging, mining permits and road construction that will help local economies and improve forest health.

The draft report identified more than two dozen “risks and concerns,” most of which identified federal management as inadequate, cumbersome and adverse to local needs and economies.

Its five recommendations called for “reducing wildfire fuels” through logging, increasing access for “multiple use,” increasing “economic production” on federal lands, strengthening local involvement in management of the lands and ensuring that laws favorable to state and local priorities are followed.

Yet Democratic members of the panel and others said the report and the discussion seems to be pointing toward support of transferring federal lands to state management.

They noted that the state Republican Party last month supported a platform plank calling for such a transfer, and that Fielder organized the appearance before the Council of a Utah legislator and others promoting the transfer.

“To see (the transfer) become part of the Republican Party platform really has raised the governor’s level of concern with where this is going,” said Tim Baker, natural resources policy adviser for Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. “I just want to be really clear: The governor does not in any way support the transfer of (federal) public lands to the state.”

Harold Blattie, executive director of the Montana Association of Counties, said the group hasn’t taken a position on the idea, but has many questions about the financial aspect of transferring federal lands to the state.

“A major piece that is missing from the whole study is a financial analysis: What are the costs? What are the rewards?” he said. “I think that would be a very arduous undertaking in and of itself.”

Fielder said after the meeting the idea behind the report is to scrutinize how federal lands are being managed and identify what could be done differently to improve it.

Transferring management of the land to the state is just one option, she said, but one everyone seems to want to talk about it.

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. tacoshmitty
    Report Abuse
    tacoshmitty - July 10, 2014 8:10 pm
    Wow. That is one of the most ridiculous, misguided comments I've seen in awhile. I wish I could just spout out stuff with no facts backing it up and believe it as truth. Nice work.
  2. Sherlock
    Report Abuse
    Sherlock - July 10, 2014 12:49 pm
    What most folks don't know is that BLM is actively looking to dump (sell off properties) they don't want to be bothered with...!

    And, both the USFS and BLM are closing roads to these properties as part of the process in getting rid of land they don't want to manage...

    The road closures are part of the plan that have resulted in States wanting to take back our Public Lands before the Fed's sell them off...

    Look at Nevada, BLM selling of land to China... What gives...?
  3. justme59601
    Report Abuse
    justme59601 - July 10, 2014 8:04 am
    i'd like to see your point of view but i can't bend that way
  4. enu_22
    Report Abuse
    enu_22 - July 10, 2014 7:46 am
    Look for and propose solutions to the problems with Federal land management. Transferring land to the State will also transfer the problems and create a financial crisis along with it - thus adding to the problems. The Republican Party has many intelligent people but apparently they all suffer from an acute cranial-rectal inversion.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Independent Record

Great Helena Businesses

Featured Offers & Deals