Court denies appeal of Helena man who shot wife, nanny

2013-11-25T16:08:00Z 2013-11-25T23:39:21Z Court denies appeal of Helena man who shot wife, nannyBy EVE BYRON Independent Record Helena Independent Record
November 25, 2013 4:08 pm  • 

The Montana Supreme Court has denied the appeal of a Helena man who shot and nearly killed his unarmed wife and nanny in 2010.

Jeremy MacGregor raised six issues in his appeal, saying that the district court erred by failing to inquire into his claim of ineffective counsel, didn’t grant him a speedy trial, shouldn’t have allowed evidence of a prior assault on his wife, gave an erroneous jury instruction, improperly imposed parole restrictions and allowed a juror on the panel who shouldn’t have served.

But in a 22-page ruling, the Supreme Court shot down the appeal on every count and affirmed that decision last week. MacGregor remains in the Crossroads Correctional Facility in Shelby, serving two 100-year sentences after being found guilty of two counts of attempted deliberate homicide.

The court noted, in part, that MacGregor acted as his own counsel and it was his own fault that it took so long to bring the matter to court.

MacGregor had repeatedly admitted to the shootings but said he was “spiritually assaulted” at the time by demonic forces after inadvertently eating cookies laced with marijuana. He claimed an unknown woman had brought the cookies to a bowling alley the night of the shooting.

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. madeyalook
    Report Abuse
    madeyalook - November 25, 2013 5:21 pm
    "One who represents himself has a fool for an attorney"

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick