get it home page promo

City to explore more projects in Ten Mile Watershed

2014-07-10T06:00:00Z City to explore more projects in Ten Mile WatershedBy TOM KUGLIN Independent Record Helena Independent Record
July 10, 2014 6:00 am  • 

The city of Helena will select a new collaborative committee to explore future forestry projects in the Ten Mile Watershed.

The city convened the Ten Mile Watershed Collaborative Committee in 2008 to address threats to the city’s water supply from wildfire. In June 2009, the committee made recommendations to the city and the U.S. Forest Service, which included the Red Mountain Flume Chessman Reservoir Project calling for logging and other restoration work in the drainage.

Although neither the Forest Service nor the city has proposed any future projects, a new collaborative committee is needed to examine and possibly propose future work in the watershed, said City Manager Ron Alles.

“It’s important to have an active committee when projects start rolling,” he said. “We’ll need to address concerns with the Forest Service and be looking to take things to the Forest Service.”

At least some of that work could include logging trees killed by pine beetles that threaten communities or infrastructure, Alles said.

Alles made the announcement Wednesday evening with representatives from the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Lake Helena Watershed Group, U.S. Forest Service, Tri-County Firesafe Working Group, Bureau of Land Management, the Environmental Protection Agency and Natural Resource Conservation Service at an open house at the Baxendale Fire Station.

The purpose of the open house was to find ways to integrate the public into work in Ten Mile, said Marshall Thompson, partnership coordinator for the Helena National Forest.

“It’s really about what needs to be done and for different organizations to talk about what they’re doing in the watershed,” he said.

Work in the watershed ranges but includes forest restoration, mining cleanup and water quality work, he added.

The city will begin recruiting members for the new committee, called the Ten Mile South Helena Forest Restoration Collaborative Committee, if the Helena City Commission approves the measure. Alles expects approval to come in the next couple of weeks.

The new committee will have 11 members, and, unlike the previous committee, will not include any federal or state agency personnel. Agencies will serve as technical advisers for representatives from conservation groups, timber, city and county government and motorized and nonmotorized users, Alles said.

“A lot has changed since the original collaborative came together,” he said. “The pine beetles hit their height in 2010, and with the fuels we’re left with, now there’s new conditions that have to be addressed.”

Most important for the city of Helena is getting residents to participate in the process, Alles said.

In May, the Helena National Forest and DNRC announced a joint-chiefs’ agreement to share work on the Red Mountain Flume Chessman Reservoir project. DNRC spearheaded contracting for the project and final bids for logging 300 acres near the reservoir and flume are due this Friday.

In late June, the Montana Ecosystems Defense Council and the Native Ecosystems Council filed a federal lawsuit alleging that the project jeopardized protected species, the chance of wildfire in a specific location was low and the Forest Service needed more environmental analysis.

After filing the lawsuit, Director of the Native Ecosystems Council Sara Johnson said the Forest Service had plans for additional logging in the drainage, and that the cumulative effects went beyond the small project at Chessman.

Alles emphasized that if the collaborative or the Forest Service proposed any new work, those projects would each be judged comprehensively on their own merits.

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. Montana Mike
    Report Abuse
    Montana Mike - July 10, 2014 10:03 am
    It's good to see you're keeping an open mind.........
  2. brigham
    Report Abuse
    brigham - July 10, 2014 8:37 am
    It is important to note that the current "collaborative" group was started *before* the pine beetle outbreak. The pine beetles are just the latest excuse by those who have long wanted to destroy our public lands for corporate profits.

    This "collaborative" group manufactured a fake crisis by lying to the public in an attempt to destroy our public lands -- including our watershed -- for corporate profits.

    The idea of logging one's watershed is insane. It reminds me of the lead-up to the Iraq War in that we don't know whether those backing such a ridiculous policy are doing so because they're corrupt or because they're evil. But we do know that no knowledge public servant would back such a wrong-headed proposal.

    If the Helena City Commission wants to protect the watershed, step one is reject the collaborators. If the Helena City Commission is not interested in protecting the watershed, but instead has a priority of government welfare for logging companies, then by all means vote to repeat the same mistake.

    But only a fool would believe this is about fire. This is about corporations stealing from the public at the expense of our water.

    The Helena City Commission needs to stop enabling awful public policy. There is no excuse for allowing people to manufacture a fake crisis to rip off the public. No excuse.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick


Follow the Independent Record

Great Helena Businesses