Circ activation contest

Helena district fails in progress report

2011-08-14T00:00:00Z 2011-08-18T09:50:02Z Helena district fails in progress reportBy ALANA LISTOE Independent Record Helena Independent Record
August 14, 2011 12:00 am  • 

Educators have long said that No Child Left Behind’s attempt to get all students at a certain level by 2014 is impossible, but the superintendent in Helena says that doesn’t mean that all students

shouldn’t improve every year.

“It’s a snapshot of our district compared to others in the state,” superintendent Keith Meyer said. “I want to take the data and find out what the story is telling us.”

Under current law, Helena schools are at risk of federal restructuring and cuts in funding, but a potential waiver option from the Obama administration could provide the district some breathing room.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan recently said that 82 percent of schools in America could be labeled failures as early as next year without a law change.

While State Superintendent Denise Juneau is interested in the waiver, she first wants to see what strings are attached before deciding whether Montana will apply for it. Juneau is expected to make an announcement Monday about her negotiations with the federal government.

“Montana students and teachers have been working very hard to improve test scores in reading, math and science,” she said. “Their efforts are demonstrated by the progress in our overall academic performances statewide.”

Juneau says that standardized testing is only one piece of the accountability system since it only gives a snapshot of one day every year in three curriculum areas.

Schools are required to meet 41 benchmarks on the state test to meet AYP under the federal NCLB.

A school’s adequate yearly progress is calculated based on test participation, academic achievement, graduation rate and other statistics.

Every few years, the percentage of students who must achieve proficiency on state tests increases to get closer to the 2014 deadline of 100 percent proficiency for all students.

Five of the 15 Helena schools which participate in the Criterion Referenced Test met AYP requirements. School officials are now sorting out the data.

“We are currently dissecting the information and looking at the pieces from a district and in each of the schools and comparing it to the state,” Meyer said.

The plan is to present the data to school trustees at a planning session on Sept. 27, which will play into the district’s developing strategic plan, Meyer said.

Meyer, a former teacher, said assessments are helpful for the growth of students, but there are many ways to assess a student’s ability to learn.

“I never was a teacher that was fearful of the tests — I used it as a measurement on how well I was delivering the curriculum,” he said.

Meyer said the information about how students scored on the test will help the district prioritize.

A full report of how all schools in Montana did on the AYP report card is available online at

Reporter Alana Listoe: 447-4081 or

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. abodox33
    Report Abuse
    abodox33 - August 15, 2011 11:12 pm
    I think that I could jump over a 6 foot bar if I got a running start. I am going to have to try that soon! Sorry to hear that your kids are dumb, Helena :(
  2. DonaldM
    Report Abuse
    DonaldM - August 14, 2011 9:14 am
    The invalidity of NCLB has to be clear to almost everybody by now. Ignore the law, its tests, and everything else associated with it; and quit reporting about it.

    Don't try to amend it, fix it, or anything else. Let it expire and forget about it-and Obama's substitution for it.
  3. Matthieu Oppedahl
    Report Abuse
    Matthieu Oppedahl - August 14, 2011 7:33 am
    This is as surprising as hearing that 80% of the country couldn't high-jump over a bar set at six feet....

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick