As the United States appears to be moving toward the return of a $1 trillion annual deficit and growing national debt, the four Republicans seeking their party's nomination to run for the U.S. Senate this fall each have a plan they say will turn that around.
The candidates are Big Sky businessman Troy Downing, former Billings judge Russ Fagg, state legislator and surgeon Al Olszewski and state Auditor Matt Rosendale.
Whoever wins the primary will run against Democrat U.S. Sen. Jon Tester, who is seeking his third term. The race is expected to be closely watched and hard fought, with money already flowing into the state and advertisements flooding Montanans' televisions and social media feeds.
All four primary candidates strongly support the $1.5 trillion tax bill members of their party passed at the end of last year, pointing to and sharing stories they’ve heard on the campaign trail from people who have seen their paychecks increase. They’ve also all panned the $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill passed in March.
Both pieces of legislation are cited in the Congressional Budget Office report as contributors to a national debt expected to reach $29 trillion by the end of the decade and deficit increases, something that can be tricky for Republican candidates to navigate this year. But the CBO report also predicts the tax bill will increase economic growth by 0.7 percent and add 1.1 million jobs to the economy over the next 10 years, much better points for campaigns.
Downing said that next steps to create more growth in the economy involve lowering regulations.
"One of the problems with an expansive government is it tries to be all things to all people. That attempt at protecting us takes away our basic freedom to make decisions. We thrive best when allowed to make our own decisions," Downing said.
Fagg said he sees the path to economic prosperity through decreasing regulations, by using a cost-benefit analysis.
He also called out the need to "modernize" the Endangered Species and Equal Access to Justice acts to give business a more reliable regulatory environment. Allow the state’s natural resource economy to thrive would create jobs that keep young people in the state, he said.
"We can manage our forests in a sustainable fashion so we don’t take any more than what’s growing each year and develop those resources to provide jobs and provide lumber for the economy," Fagg said.
Rosendale, along with Downing, said flattening out the tax brackets would also help Montana individuals and businesses keep more of their own money to reinvest and boost the economy instead of serving special interests.
"The tax code is just too big. If you flatten out the tax rates … and you start eliminating the different write-offs that are allowed to take place there, you make it so the special exemptions have gone away, it’s better for business and it’s better for Montana," Rosendale said.
Olszewski said the best way to keep growing the economy is to focus on cutting federal spending.
"We need to reign back on welfare spending," Olszewski said. "It blew up. It ballooned during the Great Recession in 2008 and despite the fact we now have the lowest unemployment rate in the last 40 years, the fact is we have not reigned back in food stamps, TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) and other issues."
While all candidates called for cutting federal spending, Olszewski focused the most on looking at how much is dedicated to welfare programs.
"What we need to do is, we still need a safety net for our most vulnerable, but it is time for us to refocus and truly make sure the people who are receiving it are truly eligible for those issues," Olszewski said.
Olszewski added that "everything needs to be on the table" to look at for spending reductions, with the caveat that military and national security needs should be adequately funded.
Fagg said the first place he'd look to trim is the U.S. Department of Education, saying he doesn't see the need for such a large federal agency, and control should be placed with local school boards. Cutting defense spending is off limits, Fagg said. But he did propose freezing 2019 spending at 2018 levels, saying that combined with economic growth of 3.5 percent, the budget would balance in three years.
Downing referenced his business background.
"We need to start approaching this as business people rather than as politicians and let’s look at the basics business of this. You cannot just spend money that you don’t have," Downing said. "If you’ve already maxed out all your credit cards, you can’t expect the credit cards to start giving you more." He said the United States needs to first figure out what needs to be fully funded — national security, basic infrastructure — and then figure out what's left for other programs and agencies.
Rosendale said just about every government agency can be reduced if the workforce is made more efficient, adding he's reduced operating costs by 23 percent by cutting total staffing 6 percent at the auditor's office.
"It takes someone who is willing to look line by line at different budget items at different agencies and say, 'This is working, this isn’t working,'" Rosendale said."
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(11) comments
The great news is the noose keeps getting tighter around the neck of that stupid orange POS!
~ To hold any effectiveness in congress; Mr. Fagg needs to run as an Independent,
otherwise Fagg will just by another steer in Trumps un-herd. ~~
Enough said:
“Steve Bannon, leader of the charge against the Republican party establishment and former adviser to President Donald Trump, has endorsed Matt Rosendale in Montana’s 2018 Senate race.”- Independent Record, October 19, 2017.
“I was thrilled to have met with Steve Bannon a few weeks ago. I’m proud to have earned the support of both Steve and the Pro-Trump group Great America Alliance."- Matt Rosendale
Ah, this is precious.
Like all of the republican candidates representatives representing us they should just lie through their teeth to republican voters like the others did. Repub voters would rather be lied to than hear the truth. I believe the old maxim that Montanans can smell BS from a mile away - unless they are republicans listen to the latest out of touch millionaires BS them at the county fair or on the 4,000th ad AFP or the NRA bought them.
They elected Daines who's lied through his teeth during every campaign promising to look out for average Montanan's, not to touch social security or cut medicare/caid, and a host of other things. The reason he refuses to meet with people in Montana is that people have figured out that when you can see his mouth moving - you know he's lying. But repubs still love voting for him.
A millionaire trophy rancher from out of state, Gianforte actually beat a guy up the day before his election...and republicans convinced themselves that this was a solid well seasoned guy to vote for...!?!? He couldn't even be honest in either campaign - remember his loads of fake news ads and mailing paid for by out of state groups attacking opponents - and he even told reporters he wasn't sure he could support TrumpsCare fiasco which hide huge tax cuts for the rich (like him) in a bill to raise prices, cut care and defund medicare/caid by billions...and then turned around hours later and told lobbyists HE LOVED IT!
Zinke was the ultimate in a sleazy operator - having run ins at every level showing his character. His blowing in the wind nature on every issue, his travel fiascos before and after, his outing Seal team 6, his abuse of a PAC to enrich himself that he started...and you voted for him twice. Holy Frijoles!
Even worse...it doesn't matter what lies they tell you...they'll same the same things by pretending their really gonna really, really fiscally responsible and hold the line on (insert lie here). And even though the public has been fairly clear - a majority of Montanans and a clear majority of Americans don't want the overwhelming male congress to be messing with their right to an abortion in any way - they can always be counted on for throwing their morality into our lives.
But as soon as McConnell, Ryan or his replacement, and Emperor Trump demand their fealty they'll be there sticking their collective noses right up you know where and voting against our interests. Tax cut for the rich disguised as an awful health care bill? Count them in! More Bush trickle down tax cuts that crashed the economy in 2007 into depression? YOU BET!
Adding trillions to the deficit (even though they used to scream about deficit spending if the black fellow did it)? HECK YEAH! Support a pedophile for the Senate in Alabama out of desperation at losing seats? Count the Montana Republicans IN!
Typical GOP platform blather. Just what regulations would they cut and how are such regulations hindering business and job growth at a time out economy is striving?
How can they support tax cuts that added a trillion to our economy, and then slam a budget that also added debt?
If they are all concerned about fiscal conservatism, what do they think about the spending habits of Pruitt and Zinke?
The article states: "Rosendale said ........ he's reduced operating costs by 23 percent by cutting total staffing 6 percent at the auditor's office." Now THAT is a pretty good trick. I'd like to see the numbers to support that statement.
I do agree that nearly every government agency could probably cut 10% from their budget and not hurt services. However, Republicans always talk about it but seldom follow through.
Elephant in the room----- Potential savings of $1 Trillion annually would be possible by implementing Medicare-For-All. Now there is some low hanging fruit that is worth going after!
23% - at least half was a result of the agency budget cuts from the governor, the rest is from wrongful terminations, wage disputes and "vacancy savings" which are quickly creating SEVERE staff deficiencies within the agency due to the refusal to fill the vacancies of departed staff.
Ima, you use the words "SEVERE staff deficiencies", but what is the measuring stick you use? Is the public being inconvenienced by these deficiencies, and if so, how?
I notice that they all walk that party line to protect the military-industrial complex. When looking for waste they apparently don't think they'd find any there.
"Fagg said the first place he'd look to trim is the U.S. Department of Education, saying he doesn't see the need for such a large federal agency, and control should be placed with local school boards."
That's right, Russ, get rid of that department and let local school districts cover all the costs of special education and leave it up to them whether or not to enforce IDEA. If a local school board wants to spend $70 million on a football stadium, like schools in Texas have, instead of targeting special education and other academic targets, why should the federal government regulate away their right to do so?
"One of the problems with an expansive government is it tries to be all things to all people. That attempt at protecting us takes away our basic freedom to make decisions. We thrive best when allowed to make our own decisions," Downing said.
Ah, yes, that over-bearing federal government that regulates, regulates, regulates.
Perhaps he'd like to extend his laissez faire philosophy and get rid of the Food and Drug Administration. After all, who is the government to tell business what products they can foist on the populace? Why shouldn't the free market take care of these issues since "We thrive best when allowed to make our own decisions?"
If a company sells a food or drug that makes people sick, according to conservative philosophy that would hurt their sales and they would have to make corrections or lose business.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.