Circ activation contest

Parents get used to new PACE

2010-08-03T00:00:00Z Parents get used to new PACEBy ALANA LISTOE Independent Record Helena Independent Record
August 03, 2010 12:00 am  • 

From PEAK and SACC to PACE. It’s an acronym nightmare. So far, the transition from two summer programs to one hasn’t exactly been smooth for students, parents and school district employees, either.

This year, the Proving Activity Centers for Enrichment program replaced the Providing Enrichment Activities for Kids and School Age Child Care summer programs from previous years.

PACE was divided into two groups — “enrichment” and “exploration,” and moved from Broadwater to Bryant and Central elementary schools, which was somewhat confusing for families as the program began.

The enrichment portion was held for five weeks beginning the week after school let out for the summer, and 303 young people participated. Exploration began at the same time, but it lasts until school resumes at the end of August. Nearly 360 students are participating.

“Overall it wasn’t without complications,” said Superintendent of Helena Public Schools Bruce Messinger.

For Kryss Kuntz’s 9-year-old daughter, who has been participating in the Helena School District’s summer programs for three years, the program was a benefit.

“She always enjoyed the activities,” Kuntz said. “The people who work behind the scenes work awful hard, and they sure switched it up.”

Not only did the district change the name and location of the summer program, but it also implemented a new online registration and pay system. The program intended to make accounting easier for the business department as well provide families with an electronic way to register and make payments, but both have proven challenging.

“It’s hasn’t been the easiest process,” Kuntz said of the software program.

She said as glitches came up with registration or payments she would call the main office, and the district staff was helpful walking her through the process and answering her questions.

One particular struggle with the new software program has been overriding the system when families need modified tuition, Messinger said.

“Once we get going, it will be a lot more convenient for families,” Messinger said. “It worked well when people used the system like it was designed to do.”

For Kuntz, who is a single mother, one of the big issues was cost. Her bills for July and August were both over $300.

“It came as a hard hit,” she admitted.

This was Kate Fry’s first year bringing her 6-year-old daughter to the program.

“I don’t have anything to compare it to and I just go by her response,” Fry said. “She has fun, is entertained, is learning something and making some friends. It’s been good for her. She seems happy.”

Fry’s daughter mostly participated in the exploration portion, but also did two weeks of enrichment.

“I don’t have anything negative to say about the enrichment, but (staff) seemed like mostly teenagers,” she said. “Exploration was mostly ladies. I took notice of it, but it didn’t impact anything my daughter did.”

Messinger said as the program reaches completion this summer, a debriefing of sorts will help iron out the wrinkles before next summer.

“We learned some lessons that will be beneficial to us,” he said.

Two reasons for the changes — transportation and meals — were benefits to families this summer. Because Central and Bryant have a large number of low-income families, the school district was able to provide these extra services with financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Education.

As the summer wraps up in a few weeks and thoughts turn back toward the first day of school, parents can take comfort in knowing that after-school care will be the same as last year. The SACC after-school program will remain the same this fall as last year. It is available at all 11 elementary schools. The only change parents may still be adjusting to is the online registration and payment process.

Reporter Alana Listoe: 447-4081 or

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. justagirl
    Report Abuse
    justagirl - August 04, 2010 8:34 am
    Thanks epzzzz. But I am still not seeing 23/day to be all that unreasonable for child care. Still only $2.87/hour if kids are there for 8 hours. Maybe they are only there for a few hours. I know when I use to babysit back in the 80's I got paid $2-3 per hour...and that was 25+ years ago. Perhaps grants or other financial assistance can be provided for those who cannot afford it. But I still don't get why parents cannot afford to take care of their children for 2 1/2 months. It is like my propane tank..I know that it gets filled 2x a year and I plan for this over the course of the year.
  2. epzzzz
    Report Abuse
    epzzzz - August 03, 2010 1:57 pm
    justagirl, the peak program was on a sliding-scale based on income. the max amount, i think, was 64.00 a week for four days. the pace program is 23.00 a day for 4 days--it's a little higher than last year.
  3. justagirl
    Report Abuse
    justagirl - August 03, 2010 11:54 am
    So there were roughly 21 work days in July (not counting July 5th). Take 300 and divide it by 21 to get $14.28 per day. Divide $14.28 by 8 hours to get $1.78/hour. And this also includes meals and transportation for activities. Guess it doesn't seem that unreasonable to me, but maybe I am missing something.
  4. helenros
    Report Abuse
    helenros - August 03, 2010 9:05 am
    When my child was young enough for SACC, they did not provide meals or milk and cost more than private day care. While the program is making steps in the right direction, affordability will determine which kids receive the benefit of it. We need to get the costs under control. Perhaps there are grants available?

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick