Circ activation contest

Tribe looks into claim of bison waste

2011-03-03T00:00:00Z Tribe looks into claim of bison wasteThe Associated Press The Associated Press
March 03, 2011 12:00 am  • 

An investigation is under way into allegations that members of an Indian tribe from Idaho wasted game during a recent bison hunt outside Yellowstone National Park, the tribe’s chairman said. 

Nez Perce chairman McCoy Oatman confirmed the tribe was investigating the claims after Montana wildlife officials reported that a bison was killed and left behind in a recent hunt. 

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks spokesman Ron Aasheim said Tuesday that his agency turned the case over to the Lapwai, Idaho-based Nez Perce tribe in accordance with an informal agreement between the state and the tribe. 

Oatman declined to detail the allegations, saying it would be inappropriate because the case is before the tribe’s judicial system. 

He declined to say how many tribe members were under investigation, how many bison were killed or even the day the hunt took place. 

The tribe’s bison hunt will continue as planned over the next two weekends, Oatman said. 

“The investigation is ongoing and we are proceeding as normal,” he said. 

Montana law prohibits hunters from wasting any part of a game animal, bird or fish that is suitable for food. But jurisdictional questions arise when dealing with tribes, which are considered sovereign nations and have treaty rights to hunt the big-game animals. 

Oatman said wasting fish and game is a violation of tribal code but he declined to say what the penalties are, saying the judicial system would determine what is appropriate.

Since 2006, the Nez Perce and other tribes have been hunting bison on federal lands outside of Yellowstone where bison migrate to lower elevations in winter in the search for food. Tribal treaties with the federal government give them the right to hunt on traditional hunting grounds on land such as the Gallatin National Forest. 

Cayuse Indians from the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation resumed their hunts near Yellowstone this winter for the first time in 100 years. 

Oatman said this year’s hunt has been successful and without incident except for the current allegations, whereas last year no hunt was held. 

State and tribal officials have been at odds in the past over details of the hunt, such as the number the tribes are allowed to take. On Tuesday, neither the tribe nor FWP could say how many bison the tribe had taken this year.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. steeline
    Report Abuse
    steeline - March 03, 2011 9:48 am
    When the treaties were signed by and between the Indian and the Government the right to hunt buffalo was allowed as a means to feed,cloth and shelter the tribe as well as for religious purposes. Nothing was said or implied that the right to hunt buffalo was ment to be a "sport hunt".

    The treaty has outlived its' intent. Gone are the horses, bows and arrows, spears ect. Gone is the need for food to feed the Indian Tribes.
    Hunting buffalo with large caliber rifles with scopes,4X4 pickup trucks makes my case. If there is enough money to buy hunting rifles,scopes, ammo, $35,000 4x4 pick-ups, gas, modern camping gear or motel rooms etc. There is no need demonstrated here. The modern Indian is using the Treaties to vail for sport hunting. The origanal Indian would have claimed and used the meat. We have to get America Right.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick