get it home page promo

Panel OKs override of Missoula ordinance

2011-03-19T01:11:00Z Panel OKs override of Missoula ordinanceBy CHARLES S. JOHNSON IR State Bureau Helena Independent Record

A Senate committee voted along party lines Friday for a bill to nullify Missoula’s 2010 ordinance that protects residents from discrimination because of their sexual orientation, gender and gender expression.

Missoula adopted the ordinance in April 2010.

By a 5-4 vote, the five Republicans on the Senate Local Government Committee sent House Bill 516, by Rep. Kristin Hansen, R-Havre, to the Senate floor for debate. All four Democrats opposed the bill.

First, the panel approved an amendment by Sen. Art Wittich, R-Bozeman, to strike the words “resolution” and “policy” from the bill to clarify that the bill applies only to local government ordinances like Missoula’s.

It would exclude anti-discrimination resolutions like the one adopted by the city of Bozeman.

Democrats criticized the bill.

“I really oppose this bill,” said Sen. Gene Vuckovich, D-Anaconda, a former city manager. “I think it is interfering on the legal rights of the local government by the state government. I know if the federal government were to impose something like this on the state government, we would go ballistic.”

Sen. Shannon Augare, D-Browning, said local governments have been allowed to adopt local anti-smoking ordinances and those to curb drunken driving.

But when an ordinance comes up to “respect people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender” and “it’s suddenly an issue,” he said. “I find it disheartening and quite frankly shameful.”

Sen. Bruce Tutvedt, R-Kalispell, defended the right “not to be overregulated.”

He said he has heard comments from people asking about whether a business, under the ordinance, could legally keep “a certain sector” out of a multi-stall public restrooms. It was an apparent reference to transgender men using women’s restrooms, an issue raised by some people testifying against the bill in hearings.

“As a father with three young daughters—they’re grown up now—I find that a little troublesome,” Tutvedt said.

Wittich said he struggled with the bill because he is “a tremendous advocate for individual rights and local control.”

“But the fact is the state occupies the field on human rights matters,” said Wittich, an attorney.

Wittich asked why the state Human Rights Act couldn’t be expanded to include what the Missoula ordinance contains on a statewide basis. But he said that was not the bill that was before the committee Friday.

The House Judiciary Committee tabled just such a measure, HB514 by Rep. Edie McClafferty, D-Butte, earlier in the session.

“To me, it’s simply a matter of respect for the law, and the law is clear that if somebody wants to make a discrimination claim, they follow the Human Rights Act,” Wittich said.

Augare said he found it ironic that Wittich talked about respecting the law, but wants to overturn an ordinance, “which is pretty much law.”

Copyright 2015 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. getaclue
    Report Abuse
    getaclue - March 19, 2011 12:08 pm
    Good to see some common sense in the legislature.
    I especially hated the "transgender males" using womens bathrooms. I dont care if you are gay or not, use the restroom dedicated for you. Can you imagine the outrage if some dud pretended to be a trans, than rapes a women in the bathroom? Yea, long shot, but not impossible.
  2. RickyBobby
    Report Abuse
    RickyBobby - March 19, 2011 9:15 am
    I wonder if Wittich can keep a straight face when he lectures others on respect for the law...........

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Activate subscription button gif
Subscribe to Email Newsletters

Breaking news, contests, morning headlines and more. Sign up for updates from the Independent Record

Follow the Independent Record

Great Helena Businesses

Clipped From The Newspaper